exactly lmao. There's some shockingly weird opinions on here.It's not a catch if the ball hits the ground. It's not a bloody catch.
That is out.
You clearly watched a different set of replays.Nah. Fingers are underneath the ball.
Sometimes it's not reliable. This was not one of those times.we go through this every single time. the footage we're watching isn't really reliable
Not really. Soft signal is irrelevant when the replay clearly shows what happened.Seemed like the recent criticism of the ‘soft signal’ definitely influenced the 3rd umps decision there.
Yeah it's not even like they were saying "it 100% feels like you've caught it even though it's touched the ground", which would be perfectly reasonable and would explain everyone's reactions. But the reality denial that it takes to say that wasn't a catch is ridiculous.Probably the worst form of commentary is the kind that says trust me I’ve played test cricket and that’s out. Even when you can clearly see the ball hit the ground.
You mean was a catch I'm guessing?Yeah it's not even like they were saying "it 100% feels like you've caught it even though it's touched the ground", which would be perfectly reasonable and would explain everyone's reactions. But the reality denial that it takes to say that wasn't a catch is ridiculous.