***Official*** 5th Test at the SCG

[Gnske]

What on Earth was that from Smith?

Was trying the flick it between his legs again, cheeky ****

 

[vic_orthdox]

Yeah Warne is awesome on that one topic.

He's so good when they get him out in the middle or in the nets, showing the little changes that he'd make.

 

[Burgey]

He's so good when they get him out in the middle or in the nets, showing the little changes that he'd make.

Yeah no doubt Warne is a **** of the highest order but the bloke was a genius cricketer.

 

[Burgey]

Was trying the flick it between his legs again, cheeky ****

He’s the only player I’ve seen deliberately play the draw shot.

 

[Starfighter]

Yes Usman.

 

[Burgey]

Well done Ussie. Bat the rest of the day now please.

Very happy with his footwork against the spinners this dig.

 

[Starfighter]

Smith has still not got to the point where he'll be improving his batting average.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

Great work by Usman. Off 222 balls


I'd not be surprised if Crane goes wicketless this match.

 

[Starfighter]

Crane did produce a googly yesterday so it's surprising he hasn't tried it against Khawaja. The way he comes down the track you'd think he'd be at risk of walking past it.

 

[Gnske]

The shot of a man who has too many to choose from

 

[Starfighter]

I don't believe it. I just don't.

 

[Burgey]

Rare failure by Smith.

 

[Adders]

 

[Anil]

rare indeed when 83 is considered a failure...

 

[TheJediBrah]

Not hitting the stumps

edit: lmao that's a no ball

 

[Starfighter]

What the hell is he reviewing for?

 

[Burgey]

That’s a no ball

 

[Spark]

I get why that's been called but IMO that wasn't actually a no ball.

Saved them a review, though

EDIT: Hahahaha

 

[TheJediBrah]

That has got to be the best thing to happen in cricket, when a team reviews for a wicket and get caught out for a no-ball

I get why that's been called but IMO that wasn't actually a no ball.

it clearly was a no-ball. Had nothing behind the line

 

[Burgey]

Silly lad.