1. Not picking a front-line spinner. They didn't take Leach to the sub-continent and once again refused to pick him (or another front-line spinner here)
2. Persisting with Moeen Ali. Let's be honest they are plenty of club bowlers who would be just as effective and the same level of control...pointless selecting a player not good enough with bat or ball for these conditions. He's arguably no better of a bowler than Malan either.
3. Not playing Bairstow as a batsman and picking Foakes as keeper who is a very good batsman himself..
4. Not batting Root 3. Captain doesn't have to be 3, or the best player. He does when the openers and number 3 are all fragile. Especially when he's the best player.
5. Ballance could have been a great option on flat wickets, especially if put at his natural number 4 position.
6. England didn't pick a team to win with. They picked a team to try to avoid getting bashed game after game. And it happened anyway.
7. Aus have 3 seamers and a spinner plus part-timers. England could have used the same balance..
Team I'd have selected pre-series
1. Cook
2. Stoneman
3. Root (c)
4. Ballance
5. Bairstow
6. Malan
7. Foakes (wk)
8. Overton
9. Broad
10. Leach
11. Anderson
I think this team would have had more of a chance. I'm interested what sort of a team you'd have picked pre-series (not in hindsight) and what you'd pick for the 4th test?
Test 4 (using players from the squad England have picked)
1. Cook
2. Stoneman
3. Root (c)
4. Ballance
5. Bairstow
6. Malan
7. Foakes (wk)
8. Overton
9. Curran
10. Crane
11. Anderson
I think for the 4th test I'd drop Broad and play Curran looking at the touring party. Crane would have to play instead of Leach. I'd like to give Ballance a game now the series is dead, Vince did ok though in the 3rd test. I'd rotate Vince for Ballance however just to see what happens, not like England have anything to lose from it.
2. Persisting with Moeen Ali. Let's be honest they are plenty of club bowlers who would be just as effective and the same level of control...pointless selecting a player not good enough with bat or ball for these conditions. He's arguably no better of a bowler than Malan either.
3. Not playing Bairstow as a batsman and picking Foakes as keeper who is a very good batsman himself..
4. Not batting Root 3. Captain doesn't have to be 3, or the best player. He does when the openers and number 3 are all fragile. Especially when he's the best player.
5. Ballance could have been a great option on flat wickets, especially if put at his natural number 4 position.
6. England didn't pick a team to win with. They picked a team to try to avoid getting bashed game after game. And it happened anyway.
7. Aus have 3 seamers and a spinner plus part-timers. England could have used the same balance..
Team I'd have selected pre-series
1. Cook
2. Stoneman
3. Root (c)
4. Ballance
5. Bairstow
6. Malan
7. Foakes (wk)
8. Overton
9. Broad
10. Leach
11. Anderson
I think this team would have had more of a chance. I'm interested what sort of a team you'd have picked pre-series (not in hindsight) and what you'd pick for the 4th test?
Test 4 (using players from the squad England have picked)
1. Cook
2. Stoneman
3. Root (c)
4. Ballance
5. Bairstow
6. Malan
7. Foakes (wk)
8. Overton
9. Curran
10. Crane
11. Anderson
I think for the 4th test I'd drop Broad and play Curran looking at the touring party. Crane would have to play instead of Leach. I'd like to give Ballance a game now the series is dead, Vince did ok though in the 3rd test. I'd rotate Vince for Ballance however just to see what happens, not like England have anything to lose from it.