Aesthetically, obviously this one was better because it at least bounced and looked a massive jaffer. The one's that go under-ground - mehIn terms of WACA crack wickets, it wasn’t as unplayable as Ambrose to Blewett in 1996/97 but it has to be in second place.
Hit a crack. Very lucky. Imo he would struggle to make the WI side.Cue the peanut gallery complaining about Starc and lucky wickets.
It will be over tonight if they take 1 more wicket in the next few overs.Not much of a fight yet. Should be over by lunch or a little after tomorrow.
Maybe as a bowler but would walk in as a batsman.Hit a crack. Very lucky. Imo he would struggle to make the WI side.
brathwaiteMaybe as a bowler but would walk in as a batsman.
Well, it was lucky.Cue the peanut gallery complaining about Starc and lucky wickets.
that was unbelievableChappelli - one thing Australia will need is a really good leg-spinner. I think Mitchell Swepson is the best of them. **** off Garry.
An element of luck != “lucky”. No one claimed Johnson’s ball to Cook in Adelaide two years ago was ‘lucky’ despite bowling an in-swinger that clearly hit something and ducked away.Well, it was lucky.
The difference is, Johnson's ball to Cook would still have been a good ball if it hadn't deviated ridiculously off the pitch. Starc's was a bad ball heading down leg.An element of luck != “lucky”. No one claimed Johnson’s ball to Cook in Adelaide two years ago was ‘lucky’ despite bowling an in-swinger that clearly hit something and ducked away.