It wasn’t true in the first and second tests though. Neither Brisbane nor Adelaide were roads. Scoring rates were slow and batsmen had to grind hard to put up runs. Fmd Steve Smith took 300 plus balls to make a hundred, and he’s God.What you say is as true as the fact that series in Australia aren't won without 1st innings scores of 450+.
The whole team is to blame - the bowlers and batsmen are both putting pressure on each other.
My only point is that Test series in Australia are won through the consistent posting of 450+ 1st innings scores. Teams that fail to do so, don't win series Down Under. This should be noted amongst the stick being piled into England's bowlers at the moment.It wasn’t true in the first and second tests though. Neither Brisbane nor Adelaide were roads. Scoring rates were slow and batsmen had to grind hard to put up runs.
Perth has been flat as expected, but the first two pitches gave the bowlers enough. The idea this series has been a road-fest so far just doesn’t cut it.
Well in that case the first thing to do is obvious. You know how the Americans in World War 2 put all the Japanese in horrible camps because they were a threat to national security after they bombed the American fleet? Just copy that, maybe give them their own team like the Americans did too.A Shield team only plays four first-class games less than a county championship team, and you cannot really compare the two considering the Shield exclusively consists of Australians (and Mason Crane) whereas the championship has overseas, kolpakers and guys on second passports which allow English counties to rotate eligible Englishmen in and out of the first team. I'm never going to believe that playing less competitive (first-class) cricket produces better (first-class) bowlers. The format of sixteen games/two divisions (2000 - 2016) saw Steve Harmison, Simon Jones, Fred, Swann and Monty flourish.
Then your point is stupid. Because it's not true in the slightest. The only team that's won series' in Australia recently has been South Africa and I don't know if they even posted 450+ once in a Test they won, let alone consistently.My only point is that Test series in Australia are won through the consistent posting of 450+ 1st innings scores. Teams that fail to do so, don't win series Down Under. This should be noted amongst the stick being piled into England's bowlers at the moment.
Gutsy 40? Pretty 30? Sure, no worries. Stepping up to the plate with a 150 to drag your team in front? Waft, snick.
Did second innings Perth.Then your point is stupid. Because it's not true in the slightest. The only team that's won series' in Australia recently has been South Africa and I don't know if they even posted 450+ once in a Test they won, let alone consistently.
I have a thought that Root doesn't give Broad long enough spells to get wickets.Broad wasn't even that good in England last season (20 wickets at 33.90 v SA/WI)
He probably isnt currently fit enough to bowl 3x 7 over spells.I have a thought that Root doesn't give Broad long enough spells to get wickets.
5-4-3-3-2-2-3-4-2
What is the point of 2 over spells? I'd rather see 3 spells of 7 overs in the day.