I think in terms of pure quality and mental toughness, he is up there in that Dravid-Kallis-Waugh class already for me.How appropriate do people think a Smith vs Dravid comparison is? Purely in terms of application, hunger etc
Yeah he reminds me a lot of Waugh. Much more ruthless than Dravid or Waugh once set though, barely ever gets out between 50 and 100.I think in terms of pure quality and mental toughness, he is up there in that Dravid-Kallis-Waugh class already for me.
Probably, but England were on top before this partnershipDraw the favourite imo.
Pitch is flat and (despite ch 9 comms trying to imply otherwise) isn’t particularly fast. Both sides I think have a lack of confidence in their side which has resulted in conservative batting.
Starc has an amazing eye but that's about it. Mitch Johnson with a worse technique, basically.Cummins making a pretty watertight case he should be batting above Starc. Been consistently impressive in his brief Test career and just seems to be much more solid in his mindset towards batting than Starc who’s on or off in his batting.
He'd get in our village team for sure, if he can drink obviously ?I think in terms of pure quality and mental toughness, he is up there in that Dravid-Kallis-Waugh class already for me.
yeah starc has the southee vibe about himStarc has an amazing eye but that's about it. Mitch Johnson with a worse technique, basically.
There've been guys with a greater range of shots but less application, and guys with less shots and more (very slightly, maybe) determination.I don’t think I’ve watched a batsman before with the raw hunger of Steve Smith.
The guy edged the ball (along the ground) after his hundred for two and then spent 30 seconds berating himself
Has there ever been someone who batted more like a robot that desperately needed WD40 than Mitch?Starc has an amazing eye but that's about it. Mitch Johnson with a worse technique, basically.
Yep. Cummins looks like a proper batsman, Starc's basically a good slogger. Latter makes for good 9's but not 8's. Cummins (and Patto) can easily handle 8 IMO.Cummins making a pretty watertight case he should be batting above Starc. Been consistently impressive in his brief Test career and just seems to be much more solid in his mindset towards batting than Starc who’s on or off in his batting.
When it came off it was glorious though. **** hit the ball harder than almost anyone I've seen, was genuinely dangerous to be a close fielder when he teed off.Has there ever been someone who batted more like a robot that desperately needed WD40 than Mitch?