Miller has flattered to deceive.... but he has improved a great deal in the last 18 months. But I`m still not convinced...Can't believe we are comparing Miller with Duminy and Behardien. Miller is far better if you strictly compare past performances alone, and more so if you compare potential
QDK is doing great opening and is the best ODI bat after AB and Amla. Should not move him to 6 and waste his potential.Miller has flattered to deceive.... but he has improved a great deal in the last 18 months. But I`m still not convinced...
I still think SA is sticking to rigorously to formulae.... I would rather put Markram in with Amla as openers and put QDK at 6. He can play both positions and solves SA`s problems of a ball strike at 6. But that is not going to happen.
They should try more players in the middle-order (in Duminy/Behardien's place) rather than doing this.Amla rested, Markram called up for last ODI
Amla rested for final ODI; Markram called up - ESPNcricinfo
Its not like he has less potential at 6, his role just changes.QDK is doing great opening and is the best ODI bat after AB and Amla. Should not move him to 6 and waste his potential.
I would agree if we had any decent middle order batsmen available. But at the moment our best prospects tend to bat top 4 in the FC of SA. (Breetze is another with huge potential!). I understand why batsmen dont want to bat out of position, but I am also of the opinion you need to try pick your most skilled batsmen and find the best place for them in the international setup.They should try more players in the middle-order (in Duminy/Behardien's place) rather than doing this.
Rossouw can play at no. 4 - not sure if he's fit thoughI would agree if we had any decent middle order batsmen available. But at the moment our best prospects tend to bat top 4 in the FC of SA. (Breetze is another with huge potential!). I understand why batsmen dont want to bat out of position, but I am also of the opinion you need to try pick your most skilled batsmen and find the best place for them in the international setup.
He went Kolpak, not eligible.Rossouw can play at no. 4 - not sure if he's fit though
shameHe went Kolpak, not eligible.
de Bruyn at 4 would not be a bad shout... but he has not been doing great since heading back to the domestic competition.They could give de Bruyn a go at 4; they probably wouldn't want to bat him any lower than that though, and it'd mean either resting Faf/AB or batting one of them at five.
He's only batted twice since going back there and hit 195 in one of those innings.de Bruyn at 4 would not be a bad shout... but he has not been doing great since heading back to the domestic competition.
AB at 5 is the best option for SA anyways...when AB plays at 4 that batting lineup looks too top-heavyThey could give de Bruyn a go at 4; they probably wouldn't want to bat him any lower than that though, and it'd mean either resting Faf/AB or batting one of them at five.
Ahh but he got 0 in the other one..... sorry probably still getting a hang over from his recent performance at int level.He's only batted twice since going back there and hit 195 in one of those innings.
He's in the current squad and has played one ODI against Ireland, where he opened and made a century. But he's another player who is better suited up the order, so doesn't solve the 5/6 problem.I think some want to try fit Bavuma in the ODI team
Then why is Temba in the squad? It reminds me a little of a dude's names who I have forgotten (not a great sign) having a serious moan when picked for an Indian ODI series as the reserve batsman, someone goes down and they call up Elgar who comes straight into the team.Screw the qouta system, markram should of been in the squad ahead of bavuma to start with.
Markram list record: avg 41.95 strikerate of 94.91 with 4 hundreds
Bavuma avg 29.12 strikerate of 80.35 with 2
Bavuma needs a lot of work on his white ball game...