• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Stokes Arrested

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No one knows what was being said. He might have been taunting Stokes about the four sixes in the T/20 final. Another valid mitigating circumstance to justify attempted murder.
Well, this thread has turned into a real pack of ****, but this post from the 19th page surely takes the biscuit:

I mean, seriously, when is attempted murder ever "justified"? It's attempted murder, for crying out loud. It is never "justified".

There's some guy out there who suffered actual bodily harm, who may or may not have been culpable in an attack and may or may not have been backing off at the time. We don't know.

But, for crissakes, it absolutely wasn't "justified", and the attitude expressed in that post is beyond repugnant.
 

igorbalis

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
I'm 25, and have been on hundreds of (mostly ****) nights out in the UK; in my crap provincial town in the Midlands, for three years at university in Liverpool, and plenty of other cities too. I can count the number of proper fights I've seen on one hand, and I don't think I've ever seen anything as bad as what Stokes did.

I just don't think it IS that common. Mitigating factor that I'm a hip young cat who goes to bars frequented by groovers such as myself, rather than the Yates's in Burnley 5 jagerbombs for a tenner lad what you looking at lad ****ing spark you out lad i've got a tiny willy lad. No thanks, I'm gonna chat to this Belgian chick about Captain Beefheart, yeah?
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Well, this thread has turned into a real pack of ****, but this post from the 19th page surely takes the biscuit:

I mean, seriously, when is attempted murder ever "justified"? It's attempted murder, for crying out loud. It is never "justified".

There's some guy out there who suffered actual bodily harm, who may or may not have been culpable in an attack and may or may not have been backing off at the time. We don't know.

But, for crissakes, it absolutely wasn't "justified", and the attitude expressed in that post is beyond repugnant.
Is this another one of those posts where you post something incredibly stupid and then when Adders calls you a dick you say you were obviously joking?
 

igorbalis

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Whether or not you think Stokes was justifiably using self-defense, I think it's pretty clear he's a total scrote of a human.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I’ll take that as a “yes”.
Don't go full Adders on me and make a complete fool of yourself

If you read the last few pages you would see the origin of the joke. You may or may not find it funny, probably not, but I'm sure your smart enough to see what I was going for at least.
 
Last edited:

Smudge

Hall of Fame Member
I didn't say that. I said it is a regular British city scene and the participants usually end up with a caution and a fine.
Evidence/stats to back this up please.
You just have to walk down a high street. Do you see those people getting a criminal record? They usually lock them up in the drunk tank overnight, charge them, fine them something like £100 and release them. You lot are acting like this is some unprecedented thing. The only thing unique about it is it concerned an international cricketer.
To be fair, sledger, he's got you utterly bang to rights here. Top statting, evidencing and forumming from S. "Glad I'm Not A" Kennedy.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Whilst that might make it better morally (from some perspectives, at least), legally it doesn't help him one jot.
If this goes to a jury, the morality angle might help right? Or will the jury be supposed to make a decision only based on the facts and law and stuff?
 

Top