Replace Mendis honestly. His meme knock against Aus has overshadowed his mediocrity for long enough.Viriya likes this.
Hey, how long is Chandimal out for? Dilruwan making runs makes it tricky for SL next Test as I don't love him in a 4 man bowling attack. Shame that Mathews isn't bowling. Gunalithaka does not look up to it to me but who knows, he'll be better for the experience.
If Mathews hasn't moved up to 4 by this stage of his career I doubt he ever will tbhThey should just bat Mendis 3 and Matthews 4 if Angie is not bowling. The rest of the order can be sorted around these 2.
Tbf I don't know what happened in this instance as I'm not watching, but umpires have to assume a ball hitting without pitching just carries on with it's trajectory, so I guess hawkeye has to do the same.I'm pretty sure that prediction is wrong, definitely would have straightened at least slightly
you are aware that the rules sort of cover this situation yesJust looking back at the review how will the hawk eye predict what the ball will do after pitching when it hit the pads in full, theres no data to predict, thats just sus as hell
He shockingly is better than Kumara, and Gunaratne is injured and won't be batting at all.Wait, have cricinfo got it wrong or did Pradeep come in at 8? I know Herath has a bad finger, but surely Pradeep isn't a better bat than the other 2?
That would work reasonably for pacers but how will that account for spinners, the ball will definitely turn after pitching, can't assume it will go through straightTbf I don't know what happened in this instance as I'm not watching, but umpires have to assume a ball hitting without pitching just carries on with it's trajectory, so I guess hawkeye has to do the same.
How will it be covered though, I dont think theres any tech that could predict that situation, they should simply not use hawk eye if ball hits in fullyou are aware that the rules sort of cover this situation yes