honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Ah.. then it makes sense.
Based on that. First generation of a country's test cricketers rarely end up with the greatest stats.BW how can you make such a claim considering he's young and for all we know in 10 years he might get regular opportunities, regular enough to take 100 wickets. This isn't the 30s, new test teams have plenty of potential opponents now
And NZHopefully 2 new teams means all of bangas, Afghanistan and Ireland get to play a decent amount of tests from now on . Even if it's mainly against each other
They suck...?Why are Bangla playing so few matches if there is opportunity to make money off them?
India plays tons of overseas games and gets hammered but everyone acknowledges it's just because they rake in the $$$ and so you play them when you can.
Bangladesh have 161 million people. That's huge. That's 5 Australias. There is money to be made playing them. Why aren't they getting more games?
Something isn't adding up here.
India sucked and they still got 5 test tours overseas where they got walloped. Pakistan didn't get more games under the Misbah era than they did when they were crap and when they rocked by the spot-fixing scandal and all that.They suck...?
Black Warrior made the first mistake and then Daemon tagged on.
This is evidence that winning back to back BOTMs doesn't guarantee that people will read your posts properly
I didn't make any mistake lol, was replying to BW who literally said 100 test wickets. Looks like it was a typo.What mistake? The first post was about whether Rashid Khan would get to 800 test wickets and break Murali's record or not. In order to take 800 test wickets, he would have to play 100 plus tests. There is no mistake here mate. It's all part of the same conversation
It's like CW won't even read your posts if you don't win BOTM
It's a bullshit reason. That's the point. Bangladesh tour of New Zealand earlier this year and their triseries in Ireland with New Zealand this year were bankrolled by Bangladeshi sponsors. That's two away series they have bankrolled in countries not known for a huge Bangladeshi population or market.India sucked and they still got 5 test tours overseas where they got walloped. Pakistan didn't get more games under the Misbah era than they did when they were crap and when they rocked by the spot-fixing scandal and all that.
It's not cricketing reasons. The reason always offered is that no one wants to watch them - just like how hardly anyone wants to watch WI, SL, etc play. It's that hosting these teams are uneconomical whilst hosting India is mad $$$ regardless of how the cricket is.
Closer to 8 Australias, and 3 Englands. And on top of that I'd hazard that the percentage of the population in Bangladesh that actually cares about cricket would be astronomically larger than Australia or England.Why are Bangla playing so few matches if there is opportunity to make money off them?
India plays tons of overseas games and gets hammered but everyone acknowledges it's just because they rake in the $$$ and so you play them when you can.
Bangladesh have 161 million people. That's huge. That's 5 Australias. There is money to be made playing them. Why aren't they getting more games?
Something isn't adding up here.
And that's incorrect. Star Sports is huge in Bangladesh. Plus no matter who is the official broadcaster, a local Bangladeshi channel will pay top dollars to telecast it from them too. Any series in Bangladesh would also be watched by the Bangladeshis in England so Sky Sports come into play. There is a huge Bangladesh market in North America so your North American players - ESPN, Willow should come into play.I was pretty certain it was because the Big 3 are covered by TV Channels who don't have a stake in BD, and so can't really make money off them, but if Star Sports is popular all over BD and also have the rights to broadcast BD cricket then there is quite a lot of money to be made playing them...
Problem is those grounds tend to be packed whoever plays in the series and the grounds can justify higher ticket prices for other nations so they'd naturally choose them instead.Just imagine a Bangladesh series in England - Lords and Oval will be packed.
The populations is like 1/8th of India and the average Bangladeshi earns about half of what an average Indian does, the proportion that cares about cricket is probably more than India, but they still aren't even 1/10th of the market India is.Why are Bangla playing so few matches if there is opportunity to make money off them?
India plays tons of overseas games and gets hammered but everyone acknowledges it's just because they rake in the $$$ and so you play them when you can.
Bangladesh have 161 million people. That's huge. That's 5 Australias. There is money to be made playing them. Why aren't they getting more games?
Something isn't adding up here.
Huge following since 1999 but only some people who could afford satellites or other means had the benefit of watching bd playing in other countries. The rest had to depend on national tv if they telecasted. The real prospect of money generation occurred recently that now bd can afford having title sponsors outside the country and maybe owning telecast for local channels. A lot of money to be made now but that was not the case say when bd toured england last time in 2010.And that's incorrect. Star Sports is huge in Bangladesh. Plus no matter who is the official broadcaster, a local Bangladeshi channel will pay top dollars to telecast it from them too. Any series in Bangladesh would also be watched by the Bangladeshis in England so Sky Sports come into play. There is a huge Bangladesh market in North America so your North American players - ESPN, Willow should come into play.
If cricket was actually smart about making money and understood how to do it, it would realize pretty fast that it doesn't need to rely on Big 3 at all.
Btw the figure of 161 million is the official figure and Bangladesh is not known for transparency and efficient government institutions that can conduct accurate census.