AndyZaltzHair
Hall of Fame Member
Stage set for Babar Azam
StephenZA will like to have a word with youLol they're showing that 2002 CT semifinal where SA choked against us. Soooooooooo good.
Oh man I can't wait to see him and Howe_zat try to justify how that wasn't actually a choke.StephenZA will like to have a word with you
No I was talking about the more obvious big 4:Well Aus were losing to NZ before rain
If you meant Root-KW-Smith-Kohli then Smith didnt really get to bat. He was not out tho and the other 3 have beasted it
Dont worry, I'll create an official Choke thread very soonOh man I can't wait to see him and Howe_zat try to justify how that wasn't actually a choke.
/rancidbait
I thought you meant:No I was talking about the more obvious big 4:
Hales-Root-Morgan-Plunkett
Dhoni not being allowed to bat is the best way to use him tbfI thought you meant:
Dhoni not being allowed to bat is the best way to use him tbf
Because Pakistan lose the two overs as well.How does DL calculate those extra runs though? By any stretch of the imagination India would have scored more than 4 had they got those 2 extra overs in, even before the rain came. It matters less in a game where only 4 overs are lost overall but in games that are impacted more, this can be the difference maker.
Because Pakistan lose the two overs as well.
Plus it matters when India lost the overs. They lost them early in the innings, not late. If they had batted 48 and then lost 2 overs, the runs added would be a lot higherBecause Pakistan lose the two overs as well.
Yeah, India could pace their launch exactly the same as they would have for 50 overs. I wouldn't have minded a couple more runs but think overall it's pretty fair.Plus it matters when India lost the overs. They lost them early in the innings, not late. If they had batted 48 and then lost 2 overs, the runs added would be a lot higher