Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
It'd be close. Wagner didn't bowl well yesterday but he's been excellent for the last 18 months. Depends on what you're looking for in a third dealer I guess.wagner makes a combined xi?
Last edited:
It'd be close. Wagner didn't bowl well yesterday but he's been excellent for the last 18 months. Depends on what you're looking for in a third dealer I guess.wagner makes a combined xi?
Honestly don't even think many SA'cans would deny Wagner being selected ahead of Morkel in a current combined XI.It'd be close. Wagner didn't bowl yesterday but he's been excellent for the last 18 months. Depends on what you're looking for in a third dealer I guess.
yeah fair shout.Hell yes!! 68 wickets @ 23 in the last 2 years, been one of the best going around.
It's a strange one because it really shouldn't affect him that much mentally having the gloves in ODIs, but clearly it does.i have no issue with latham playing odis. clearly one of the best options for the format. was never a fan of him taking the gloves tho. campaigned for blundell/cleaver/seifert or any non-ronchi or latham option at the time.
Without Taylor & Boult, KW & Waggers are the only NZ'ders who'd make a combined NZ/SA side from these two XIs.....so from that point of view we've probably done well to even concede just a 100 run lead.
Good chance this test could finish today.
I think having to suddenly focus on keeping for 50 overs when he's barely done it before ... so virtually having to re-train himself, was a huge ask of someone who really was still trying to cement a spot in the one day side, and find his game in that format. I'm not surprised at all that it lead to some very poor batting form in that format ... and I don't think the selectors have anyone else to blame but themselves that it's now transferred into test cricket.It's a strange one because it really shouldn't affect him that much mentally having the gloves in ODIs, but clearly it does.
Well, 1 out of 2. Pleased to be be 23 overs in and only 2 down, a shame that one of them was Williamson though.Unfortunately that's quite likely imo.
Key of course will be to get through to 20 or 25 over mark with max 2 or 3 down, Williamson still in, when batting becomes easier. That will be difficult to achieve when there is something there for the new ball bowlers to exploit.
TBF Latham has done plenty of keeping before.I think having to suddenly focus on keeping for 50 overs when he's barely done it before ... so virtually having to re-train himself, was a huge ask of someone who really was still trying to cement a spot in the one day side, and find his game in that format. I'm not surprised at all that it lead to some very poor batting form in that format ... and I don't think the selectors have anyone else to blame but themselves that it's now transferred into test cricket.
It's so disappointing though. We had a host of one dayers this year to bring Blundell into the side and give him a chance to get used to international cricket ... starting with Bangers which doesn't get much better for an introductory series. Now Latham has failed and we're stuck with Ronchi for the Champions Trophy. Who looks mentally shot as well. At least if we'd given Blundell a go and decided not to go with him for England then Ronchi would be coming back after a good break and maybe be in a better frame of mind.
Look possibly, I'm not convinced it's purely the keeping thing...that might have contributed slightly, I think he's just horribly out of nick and down on confidence, saying nothing about his technical issue where he falls over towards leg.I think having to suddenly focus on keeping for 50 overs when he's barely done it before ... so virtually having to re-train himself, was a huge ask of someone who really was still trying to cement a spot in the one day side, and find his game in that format. I'm not surprised at all that it lead to some very poor batting form in that format ... and I don't think the selectors have anyone else to blame but themselves that it's now transferred into test cricket.
It's so disappointing though. We had a host of one dayers this year to bring Blundell into the side and give him a chance to get used to international cricket ... starting with Bangers which doesn't get much better for an introductory series. Now Latham has failed and we're stuck with Ronchi for the Champions Trophy. Who looks mentally shot as well. At least if we'd given Blundell a go and decided not to go with him for England then Ronchi would be coming back after a good break and maybe be in a better frame of mind.
Tbf it is also easier to dismiss SA's top order than its tailKind of depressing that our top order batsmen appear easier to dismiss than SA's tail...
I'm not so sure, just because he's been horribly out of form doesn't mean he'll never make it as a dual form opener for me. Remember correlation doesn't always mean causation.I certainly think Latham would benefit from having a sole focus on being the best test opener he can be. Seems a fairly conscientious type and I'd say highly values his preparation leading into test series, and he hasn't had that prep here and has instead had to focus on mastering some other skills.
Selectors probably reasoned that playing ODIs might help him improve strike rotation and that sort of thing, and sometimes that does seem to work for a batsman, but I don't think it's worked for Latham here.
I know I know, I'm speculating a bit, but meh, that's my general impression.I'm not so sure, just because he's been horribly out of form doesn't mean he'll never make it as a dual form opener for me. Remember correlation doesn't always mean causation.
Yeah totally, I don't think it's just the keeping, but I think it's played a part. I can't argue with the fact that he's having technical issues atm as well.Look possibly, I'm not convinced it's purely the keeping thing...that might have contributed slightly, I think he's just horribly out of nick and down on confidence, saying nothing about his technical issue where he falls over towards leg.