the other 50% is short and wide outside off, being slapped to the boundary.Partly, though his seam position these days is better than it used to be, when you really did want to keep him away from the new ball.
... and CDG does get the new ball to swing, but he's making the batsman play only about 50% of the time, which is rubbish at his pace.
FYI if you haven't followed the match til now, the selection of De Grandhomme as a bowler is an awful joke. Should have picked an actual bowler like Matt Henry.the other 50% is short and wide outside off, being slapped to the boundary.
yeah i've seen a fair bit of new zealands home season and he seems a perfectly fine horses for courses selection. the problem is that your selectors haven't brutally cut him off as required.FYI if you haven't followed the match til now, the selection of De Grandhomme as a bowler is an awful joke. Should have picked an actual bowler like Matt Henry.
lovely timingProblem is we have the fours wickets but only one of them was one of SA's big guns (Elgar), which still leaves all of Du Plessis, Amla & De Kock to get through.
Ugh why bring back CDG, there's less swing and nibble around now and should try Patel, or even Neesham.
(Edit: And then CDG nibbles the first one, let's see if he can do that and make the batsman play)
hahahalovely timing
Don't think that there's any serious doubt that he's a better bowler than Neesh - at least on New Zealand decks.CdG almost has as many wickets as Neesham at Test level.