• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

cricrate: new cricket ratings website

viriya

International Captain
It is fine to call the Aussie attack good, but I don't really see how this attack could benefit a bat that much. Haze, Starc and then 2 30+ average spinners and Cartwright on debut was the 2nd weakest attack we picked this summer. I haven't looked up player vs player but I would assume Younus made most of his runs against the spinners too.
Does not take into account who he made the runs against - only the current rating of whoever bowled weighted by how many overs they bowled.

I know you can get more granular in recent matches but there is no such data for past era matches. Also you could argue it doesn't matter who he made runs against as long as he survived Starc Hazlewood.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
8 feels too high but when you mention all those things you did, i can accept it. its good all that is taken into consideration by the generator
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
I found how O'Keefe 6/35's were rated interesting. He scored 3312 and 2461 which is a massive gap. I realise the major difference is based on who he dismissed.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I found how O'Keefe 6/35's were rated interesting. He scored 3312 and 2461 which is a massive gap. I realise the major difference is based on who he dismissed.
4th innings wickets may have played a greater role
 

viriya

International Captain
I found how O'Keefe 6/35's were rated interesting. He scored 3312 and 2461 which is a massive gap. I realise the major difference is based on who he dismissed.
Yes, that probably explains 90%+ of the ratings difference here. The prime scalps are Kohli and Pujara - he got neither in the first innings and both in the second.
 

viriya

International Captain

viriya

International Captain
Added 95% confidence intervals to Test/ODI/T20I Batting/Bowling/All-Round career ratings as a +- range after the existing rating.
eg: cricrate | Career Ratings - Test Batting

If two players have overlapping confidence intervals this suggests that they can't clearly be separated.

If a player's lower CI bound is higher than another's higher CI bound that's a sign that there is a clear difference there.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Really, really surprised that Smith's 109 isn't his top rated performance. Although I know the 199 came in a match where no one else did that much.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Added 95% confidence intervals to Test/ODI/T20I Batting/Bowling/All-Round career ratings as a +- range after the existing rating.
eg: cricrate | Career Ratings - Test Batting

If two players have overlapping confidence intervals this suggests that they can't clearly be separated.

If a player's lower CI bound is higher than another's higher CI bound that's a sign that there is a clear difference there.
What's a confidence interval
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Interval in which the "true" rating has a 95% probability to be within, assuming it's a 95% confidence interval (which it must be, or that's ridiculously large. Still looks very big for me)
 

viriya

International Captain
Interval in which the "true" rating has a 95% probability to be within, assuming it's a 95% confidence interval (which it must be, or that's ridiculously large. Still looks very big for me)
Actually I expected that for most it was in the 100 point range and it turned out to be true. In a way what the confidence interval shows for a batsman is how consistent they are. If two batsmen have a similar a number of innings played then the one with the lower number is more consistent. Batsmen naturally have higher ranges than bowlers cos they can always get out for a duck while bowlers don't really have an equivalent.
 

Top