cnerd123
likes this
Why not both?Nah, ****. Mr_mister will be the cause of you winning.
Why not both?Nah, ****. Mr_mister will be the cause of you winning.
There's like barely any facts in this postIts not Gambhiring to state facts. Based on performances this series, Australia are obviously massive favorites and India will hardly make it to 160 and then lose by tomorrow evening.
FWIW, most betting sites have India as favourites now.India don't become favourites till the target is above 220.. That is a long long distance away. We batted well but had some generous helpings of good fortune. If our luck runs out we lose.
There's like barely any facts in this post
That's mainly because they had India as huge favorites from the beginning. In other words, if the positions were reversed exactly now they would still have India as favorites because in their book India is a much better side than Australia in these conditions.FWIW, most betting sites have India as favourites now.
I'm not sure of the weight that can be attached to what Australia posted in the first innings here, far less the relevance of what they posted on what was a better batting pitch in the first test.We are like 50 away from the lowest total Oz have posted this series mate... No one can help when you cant recognize facts in front of your eyes.
Answer lies in the fact that India collapsed in dismal fashion in last three innings and are effectively 120 odd for 4. If they score 50 more runs without losing a wicket then I'd be comfortable in thinking that India have the upper hand.I don't understand how anyone could look at the match situation as it is and come to any conclusion other than India being favourites to take the test match from here.
SS years ago(I will admit thought that when we were way ahead, I was laughing my ass out at you two and Shri fighting over the Gambhiring philosophy)
BTW who was the first person to start trying to jinx the other team by saying that their team was ****ed even though they were still ahead?