OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Shut up you dumb sjw.
Shut up you dumb sjw.
It has had a few of these, right?It's happened far too often. I don't think it's as bad a pitch as 2012 nagpur vs England. But it's still poor. Far too many shooters.
Best thing I can say is atleast it hasn't had those that rear up at the batsman too. Here at least they can sort of try and stay low to keep out the odd low one.
Some call it salt.
I think that this is happening on Day 2 is what bothers me, because the assumption is that its going to get worse as the game progresses and thus eventually morph into something unplayable by day 3/4. Already most of the runs scored have come of simply putting the bad balls away, or attempts to keep the ball out that have skewed off the edges into gaps. It hasn't been conductive for strokemaking at all.Tbh, I don't really mind seeing that happen occasionally, even on day 2. The bad decks, for mine, are when the game can't progress, where the bats find it hard to score off any ball whether well or badly pitched. Yeah there's the occasional shooter but there's still runs out there. You can bet Renshaw walked off less feeling like he was lucky to get as many as he did and more like a ton nipped in the bud.
True, but some are jumping at the batsmen too.That's a key difference. If a deck is low but predictably low, you can adjust and it's a test of good technique. If you've no idea what the deck is going to do, that's a bad (potentially dangerous) deck and technique doesn't matter.
A few yeah. But it's not like it's Sabina Park 06 with one rolling along the ground and the next up at the throat.It has had a few of these, right?
Yeah fair. But I am basically thinking that we either try to win by an innings or we probably lose tbh.Anyway, it's just what we value. As a fan, I'm happy to cop decks like this occasionally because it's far better than the era in the early 00's when groundsmen were so paranoid about making sure Tests lasted 5 days, every **** with a bat and a dick had a 50+ average.
Nagpur was worse
Make up your mind ****I'll admit Nagpur was a good pitch
One is truth, the other is pure sycophancy.Make up your mind ****
Don't make a straw man argument that deviates from the point. The politically correct brigade apparently have it right even if no one in the media or the experts agreed with them that any of those pitches were 'good'. Had they praised those tracks, they would undoubtedly use that as vindication but when it's the other way round it's derided as an appeal to authority.LOL what does PC Brigade have to do with it?
Do you also complain about every English pitch that seams like hell for Broad and Anderson in the first 2 sessions, and then turns into a road?
Yea calling a spade a spade is salt.Some call it salt.
Just shut up and watch the damn game.Don't make a straw man argument that deviates from the point. The politically correct brigade apparently have it right even if no one in the media or the experts agreed with them that any of those pitches were 'good'. Had they praised those tracks, they would undoubtedly use that as vindication but when it's the other way round it's derided as an appeal to authority.
Yea calling a spade a spade is salt.
Who are you sucking up to by calling the Nagpur pitch poor thoOne is truth, the other is pure sycophancy.
lmaoDon't make a straw man argument that deviates from the point. The politically correct brigade apparently have it right even if no one in the media or the experts agreed with them that any of those pitches were 'good'. Had they praised those tracks, they would undoubtedly use that as vindication but when it's the other way round it's derided as an appeal to authority.