TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
ok?They only started at Adelaide because the Brisbane test was moved.
ok?They only started at Adelaide because the Brisbane test was moved.
Yes, to make sure India had a more familiar pitch to begin. Australia is very accomodating that way. We started the Brisbane and then Perth tradition for the West Indies so they did not have to adjust to a raging SCG turner.They only started at Adelaide because the Brisbane test was moved.
You joke about it, but it's funny how often in recent times we've (unintentionally) played into opposition hands with our scheduling/wickets.Yes, to make sure India had a more familiar pitch to begin. Australia is very accomodating that way. We started the Brisbane and then Perth tradition for the West Indies so they not have to adjust to a raging SCG turner.
Pretty sure we established thatmaybe spark have spelled it out: Phil Hughes died and so we didn't play the first test in Brisbane
notsureifsrs.jpgIf the pitch is that flat, Australia should just not bother picking Starc and Haze. Replace them Bird and Maxwell, let the seamers come back in fresh for a wicket that might get a result.
dontworrynotsrs.gifnotsureifsrs.jpg
Nah just get Mitch Marsh to bowl 40 overs an innings. No one cares if he gets injured.If the pitch is that flat, Australia should just not bother picking Starc and Haze. Replace them Bird and Maxwell, let the seamers come back in fresh for a wicket that might get a result.
Imagine if they **** it up and leave grass on it for Haze. Won't happen but my god it would be hilarious for the reaction from some of the press/ pundits