No. There are probably better players (or, at least, players worth trying) but Munro is no longer one of them.Isn't Munro better than some of these players?
I don't quite get the point of him.God you're annoying.
the angle and timing of the photo makes it look like he's being abducted by aliensWell that's a **** score to wake up to - was intending to watch a decent chunk of the second innings but we'd already lost by the time I got up. So that sucks, but on the positive side I did find this photo of Ferguson amusing for some reason:
Interesting, can you imagine any scenario that you go three spinners in Hamilton?
It's certainly making Bruce Edgar look the brains in the former partnership/ panel.I was going to post in the 'Hesson, is it time' thread that while I've been a fan of NZ's selections for most of Hesson's regime, I think it's gotten a bit (sometimes a lot) woolly over the last 12 months. Spinner selection is possibly the single most haphazard example with all the chopping and changing between Craig, Santner, Sodhi, Patel and Todd Astle across all three formats, sometimes for as little as one match at a time. Only Santner has benefited from consisted selection - the other four must be completely confused about where they stand.
Bringing Patel into the squad here is another such WTF - we have two limited overs spinners finally performing well in Santner and Sodhi, so what on earth is the point of bringing in Patel?