Wrong thread. Definitely worthy of its own.ding
Not convinced of that tbh. I'm not knocking Gayles T20 achievements, he's no doubt a great (if not the greatest) of the format. But it's not a level playing field when he plays the shortest format exclusively........that has to be a huge advantage in his stats and performance over someone like Kohli who plays all 3 forms. All of Gayles practise and time is dedicated to T20.......who knows how good Kohli and ABDV might be if they didn't have to worry about the "other" stuff.Gayle's 10,000: great or not?
Is there really an argument that 10,000 T20 runs isn't a great achievement? If he's as far ahead of 2nd place as the video says, that's pretty impressive and all T20 players have played in the same era, so the playing field's about as level as you're going to get for this type of thing.
Also not convinced by the quoting of his poor stats against a handful of bowlers, his overall stats are an average of 41.30 and of SR 149.95 and he's performed against good bowling. I mean, I'm not a massive fan of the guy but I don't see how his achievements here can be talked down, really.
Good point, hadn't really considered that, but he did play 103 Tests from 2000-2014 and 269 ODIs from 1999-2015, so I'd argue it's only really recently that he's been able to dedicate all his time to the format. Unfortunately I can't get statsguru to give me data for all T20s to check if his stats have seen a notable upturn in the last couple of years, though. Might do it manually.Not convinced of that tbh. I'm not knocking Gayles T20 achievements, he's no doubt a great (if not the greatest) of the format. But it's not a level playing field when he plays the shortest format exclusively........that has to be a huge advantage in his stats and performance over someone like Kohli who plays all 3 forms. All of Gayles practise and time is dedicated to T20.......who knows how good Kohli and ABDV might be if they didn't have to worry about the "other" stuff.
Overall | 2015-Present | Pre-2015 | |
Matches | 280 | 87 | 193 |
Innings | 274 | 85 | 189 |
Runs | 9789 | 2981 | 6808 |
Strike Rate | 149.95 | 160.18 | 145.87 |
Average | 41.30 | 40.83 | 41.51 |
High Score | 175* | 151* | 175* |
Centuries | 18 | 5 | 13 |
Fifties | 60 | 17 | 43 |
MotM | 45 | 13 | 32 |
MotS | 3 | 1 | 2 |
4s | 749 | 214 | 535 |
6s | 718 | 247 | 471 |
This shouldn't really matter imo. Gayle also has the disadvantage of being old as ****Not convinced of that tbh. I'm not knocking Gayles T20 achievements, he's no doubt a great (if not the greatest) of the format. But it's not a level playing field when he plays the shortest format exclusively........that has to be a huge advantage in his stats and performance over someone like Kohli who plays all 3 forms. All of Gayles practise and time is dedicated to T20.......who knows how good Kohli and ABDV might be if they didn't have to worry about the "other" stuff.
Not sure about that. In interventional t20s many have better records.At T20s, there hasn't been anyone anywhere near as good.
Although his SR is at the upper end of the scale for those on that list which, since his average is still good, I would argue makes him better than a lot of the others higher than him on the list.
But it's not as clear cut as I had admittedly assumed.Although his SR is at the upper end of the scale for those on that list which, since his average is still good, I would argue makes him better than a lot of the others higher than him on the list.