Spark
Global Moderator
Cook doesn't really bother to move up the gears in the way Renshaw has, the way he starts is basically the way he bats the whole time.Could he be an Australian Alistair Cook?
Cook doesn't really bother to move up the gears in the way Renshaw has, the way he starts is basically the way he bats the whole time.Could he be an Australian Alistair Cook?
did bambi run over your dog or somethingHe's four tests in guys, and he's batted in some of the easiest conditions he'll ever see against a pretty neutered attack in Pakistan and a tired attack in South Africa... I feel you're creating another Voges.
Jesus christ this is sour. The bloke's not even 21 and has scored a Test hundred.He's four tests in guys, and he's batted in some of the easiest conditions he'll ever see against a pretty neutered attack in Pakistan and a tired attack in South Africa... I feel you're creating another Voges.
I meant more so with how young he's started and potential for longevity, rather than any similarity with their batting styles.Cook doesn't really bother to move up the gears in the way Renshaw has, the way he starts is basically the way he bats the whole time.
Right. Like I said, I'm still not confident that he'll score runs against India (or, indeed, against Broad and Anderson next summer when they inevitably go around the wicket to him straight away), but the kid knows how to score runs, which is what matters at this age.I think those praising Renshaw are probably happiest with his temperament, which seems good for a young bloke.
No but I'm pretty sure Steve Smith did.did bambi run over your dog or something
Was just thinking thisthanks for the random shot of a baby ch9
i feel ill.Was just thinking this
Indeed. At this young an age, even a century coming in at 300-2 against Zimbabwe is worthy of a little bit of praise.Jesus christ this is sour. The bloke's not even 21 and has scored a Test hundred.
Being able to construct an innings, ignore plays and misses, score within your zones is as much a "talent" as aesthetic strokemaking.Indeed. At this young an age, even a century coming in at 300-2 against Zimbabwe is worthy of a little bit of praise.
Everyone always thinks something along these lines. And not just in regards to cricket. It's the classic, "things were better in my day".Is it just me who thinks that scoring a test 100 is not as challenging as it used to be say 10 years ago? Not taking away anything from Renshaw here.
I'm not sure about this. 10 years ago was the early-mid 2000s when people were constantly crying about the lack of quality pace attacks and prevalence of flatter pitches. As time has gone on, people seem to have conveniently forgotten that those years had tons of batsmen filling their boots against mediocre bowlers. It's really weird how the narrative of the 2000s has changed.Is it just me who thinks that scoring a test 100 is not as challenging as it used to be say 10 years ago? Not taking away anything from Renshaw here.
It happens. I remember Sachin and Dravid getting a few cheap centuries batting alongside Sehwag, who was taking away all the attention at the other end by blazing to a 200 within 2 sessions or so. Makes it much easier for the other guy to settle in. Add in an already demoralized Pak attack and the dead rubber effect.Is it just me who thinks that scoring a test 100 is not as challenging as it used to be say 10 years ago? Not taking away anything from Renshaw here.