Which means Neesham or Santner or de Grandhomme batting # 5. I'd rather Munro bat at #5 and have the keeper or all-rounder bat at #6.[Munro]Good at 6 imo.
Last edited:
Which means Neesham or Santner or de Grandhomme batting # 5. I'd rather Munro bat at #5 and have the keeper or all-rounder bat at #6.[Munro]Good at 6 imo.
Oh I know!If we're not going at 7 an over by over 30 CM Punk generally chimes in with negative rubbish.
I think Neesham could be developed into a decent number 5, the other two, no. While I don't hate the idea of Munro at 5, I think he straddles the line of being someone who can build an innings during a collapse as well as being a finisher. A good number 6.Which means Neesham or Santner or de Grandhomme batting # 5. I'd rather Munro bat at #5 and have the keeper or all-rounder bat at #6.
This is Bangladesh after all ...Surprised by Tom Latham's innings today, I never knew he had those gears
Kane couldn't do that against Kenya on his best day. He's quickly becoming another Amla in LOI's..This is Bangladesh after all ...