• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan in Australia 2016/17

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Strange post that from you HB. They did roll up their sleeves and they did put up a fight. Not sure what you're disputing?

I am disputing that it is apparently Pakistan who "decided" to play better. Its not like they wont have tried in the first innings either. To do well, you need a combination of factors. LTM is implying as if it is Pakistan's choice. Easy to see why it was a **** post tbh. Hence I am calling it out.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
I am disputing that it is apparently Pakistan who "decided" to play better. Its not like they wont have tried in the first innings either. To do well, you need a combination of factors. LTM is implying as if it is Pakistan's choice. Easy to see why it was a **** post tbh. Hence I am calling it out.
I think you are arguing the person and not the post. Whatever your differences with LTM, if that post was made by someone else, I think it would have been interpretted differently.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think you are arguing the person and not the post. Whatever your differences with LTM, if that post was made by someone else, I think it would have been interpretted differently.

Not very difficult to judge what a person means by a post from their posting history, tbh.
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
All this talk about the declaration!

Or he could have just enforced the follow-on and bowled Pakistan out on the third day! (His bowlers are going to be a lot more tired now). Smith has been following the 'Alistair Cook rule book' on inanely conservative captaincy.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
All this talk about the declaration!

Or he could have just enforced the follow-on and bowled Pakistan out on the third day! (His bowlers are going to be a lot more tired now). Smith has been following the 'Alistair Cook rule book' on inanely conservative captaincy.
Or they do this, tire out their bowlers again and force an awkward 4th innings chase. Two way street.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No that's not true because he was shielding Wahab in the previous over.
I'm not sure that's relevant. Pretty sure when it gets to the last over, you'd rather the tailender/nightwatchman face the bowling and risk his wicket because if he gets out, the day ends there and Pakistan still have a chance with Shafiq still in. You shield the tailender before that not just to protect his wicket but also because if the guy gets out, you immediately have the next batsman in facing another few uncomfortable deliveries.
 
Last edited:

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Some strange play this early. Probably gonna see some movement after these two finish their spells though.
 

Top