• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia vs New Zealand ODIs 2016/17

Moss

International Vice-Captain
Williamson should stop ringing in the changes and focus on getting 2-3 tight overs in. Just too many freebies.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
the team australia is picked is fine. probably one of the more logical they've picked. there's really only one issue, the finch problem, but of course that wasn't gonna be resolved today. otherwise, the bowling attack is as it should be. marsh over faulkner is right. head over maxwell is fine in that they already made that call during the winter and it would have been a bit weird to drop head before he gets a chance in australia. marsh and hard should have been swapped in the batting order.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Williamson should stop ringing in the changes and focus on getting 2-3 tight overs in. Just too many freebies.
This is a but contradictory. He's ringing the changes because his bowlers are have been unable to get 2-3 tight overs in
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
the team australia is picked is fine. probably one of the more logical they've picked. there's really only one issue, the finch problem, but of course that wasn't gonna be resolved today. otherwise, the bowling attack is as it should be. marsh over faulkner is right. head over maxwell is fine in that they already made that call during the winter and it would have been a bit weird to drop head before he gets a chance in australia. marsh and hard should have been swapped in the batting order.
I don't get how people underrate Faulkner so much

He's a better bowler and batter than Mitch Marsh for starters, he'd be in ahead of Cummins and Hazlewood as a player easily, maybe even purely as a bowler he'd still be ahead of them in ODIs.
 

Moss

International Vice-Captain
This is a but contradictory. He's ringing the changes because his bowlers are have been unable to get 2-3 tight overs in
Yeah fair enough. But think bringing in Henry after one Feguson over was a bit knee jerk
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
With less sloppiness and another 1-2 wickets, NZ would have had a good chance of restricting Australia to something below par, maybe 250-270.

And given NZ's weak/inexperienced batting from number 4 down, it's hard to see them chasing much more than that.
 

Top