• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Kane Williamson Average Watch thread

Will Kane average 50 in both ODIs and Tests at some point before Feb 2017?


  • Total voters
    49

Blocky

Banned
Just funny how the same season Voges turned into Bradman, Smith went from average to awesome, since then he's been middling and Voges has fallen off the planet, but I'm crazy for pointing out how weak the opposition they faced were.

This is fun.
 

Rootfan

Banned
9 innings, 2 "scores", 2 ducks and 5 failures... and we're wanting to use his average in South Africa to prove a point?

That's why I don't take your stats seriously, they're freaking ridiculous.
His scores in SA are as follows : 100, 49, 0, 84, 36* and unlike Root he didn't need Steyn/Philander out of the attack to score a 100. You're simply trolling at this point and I will try not to respond to your drivel from this point on unless you shock us all by making truthful and sensible posts for a change.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Just funny how the same season Voges turned into Bradman, Smith went from average to awesome, since then he's been middling and Voges has fallen off the planet, but I'm crazy for pointing out how weak the opposition they faced were.

This is fun.
Again, completely false
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
His scores in SA are as follows : 100, 49, 0, 84, 36* and unlike Root he didn't need Steyn/Philander out of the attack to score a 100. You're simply trolling at this point and I will try not to respond to your drivel from this point on unless you shock us all by making truthful and sensible posts for a change.
You're really contradicting your username ITT
 

Blocky

Banned
His scores in SA are as follows : 100, 49, 0, 84, 36* and unlike Root he didn't need Steyn/Philander out of the attack to score a 100. You're simply trolling at this point and I will try not to respond to your drivel from this point on unless you shock us all by making truthful and sensible posts for a change.
You've missed scores, he's had nine innings in South Africa and he's failed in 5 of them.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You've missed scores, he's had nine innings in South Africa and he's failed in 5 of them.
lol no he hasn't. He's played 3 tests averaging 67.25

why are you wasting your time with this really poor trolling, It's not even remotely funny.
 

Blocky

Banned
You can't call it a good record when it's so small in sample size; otherwise Mathew Sinclair was the best batsman of the 1900s.
 

Blocky

Banned
The superb thing about cricket and the internet is that five years from now, we can come back and see I was perfectly right about how mythical Smith was.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You can call it a better record than Williamson's from a very similar sample size. Which is probably why you want to disregard it.

Jog on, mate.
 

Blocky

Banned
Oh you mean to tell me the season Voges dominated West Indies and Australia wasn't the season Smith went from a middling 40 to 58 average?

The delusion is real, the myth is propogated.
 

Top