WIn a signed copy of Supreme Bowling

[smash84]

when do we find out the answer?

 

[chasingthedon]

when do we find out the answer?

Friday evening at midnight UK time (4pm my time).

 

[The Battlers Prince]

The Gabba

 

[Shady Slim]

the home of cricket too, lord's

 

[chasingthedon]

90 minutes left to get your answers in.

 

[smash84]

can we change our answers at this point?

 

[chasingthedon]

can we change our answers at this point?

If you want to, in the next 3 minutes :-)

 

[Black_Warrior]

Old Trafford

 

[chasingthedon]

OK time's up - the correct answer is the MCG, and the first correct answer drawn out was from Howe_zat.

Congratulations - please send me your postal address to davewilson_us@yahoo.com.

 

[smash84]

****, I wanted to say mcg but went with scg

 

[Burgey]

Woo hoo. Nice work Howza.

Cheers for the promo too guys.

 

[Howe_zat]

Excellent

I look forward to reading about Bresnan's performance.

 

[smash84]

congrats howe

cricinfo reviews the book

Alan Gardner reviews Supreme Bowling by Patrick Ferriday and Dave Wilson | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo

 

[Howe_zat]

Excellent

I look forward to reading about Bresnan's performance.

Hi Dave,

I have received the book and read some fine passages, but there appears to have been a misprint as Tim Bresnan's MCG spell is not in the book. Please rectify this in all future editions.

If you are concerned about including more than 100 spells, there is an inclusion in the top 20 which can be painlessly omitted (see fig 1)

Yours,

Jake

fig. 1

 

[fredfertang]

Hi Dave,

I have received the book and read some fine passages, but there appears to have been a misprint as Tim Bresnan's MCG spell is not in the book. Please rectify this in all future editions.

If you are concerned about including more than 100 spells, there is an inclusion in the top 20 which can be painlessly omitted (see fig 1)

Yours,

Jake

Great spell though it was you need to bear in mind that we had to factor in how lamentably poor the batting side were - I appreciate Hilfenhaus raised the bar a bit, but you don't pick up many points for Ponting, Hussey and Watto

 

[chasingthedon]

95% ain't bad :-)

 

[cnerd123]

I fully expect a review of this book on the next podcast Howe

 

[chasingthedon]

Great spell though it was you need to bear in mind that we had to factor in how lamentably poor the batting side were - I appreciate Hilfenhaus raised the bar a bit, but you don't pick up many points for Ponting, Hussey and Watto

Should also point out that one of the qualifications for consideration was it has to be a five-fer :-)

 

[fredfertang]

Should also point out that one of the qualifications for consideration was it has to be a five-fer :-)

He got seven really because Swann's two and Jimmy's were really down to Bres because the batters were so desperate to get away from him

 

[chasingthedon]

He got seven really because Swann's two and Jimmy's were really down to Bres because the batters were so desperate to get away from him

Objection! Calls for speculation....