cnerd123
likes this
I don't see the point of the token fast bowler that all sub continental sides end up picking. The guy who bats at 10/11, bowls an insignificant number of overs for a lot of runs that accomplish nothing but ease the pressure on the visiting side.
I mean, I guess it adds some value in the sense of changing up the pace the batsmen are facing, not letting them settle with the spin, and they could do something with the older ball in terms of reverse swing...but do you need two of them? Surely only Shaiful would have been enough. It's like when India play both Shami and Yadav but ultimately we'd have been fine with just Shami.
Guess the second fast bowler is backup to the first in case of injury?
Should really find a fast bowling allrounder for that role then. Atleast they can add value with the bat.
I mean, I guess it adds some value in the sense of changing up the pace the batsmen are facing, not letting them settle with the spin, and they could do something with the older ball in terms of reverse swing...but do you need two of them? Surely only Shaiful would have been enough. It's like when India play both Shami and Yadav but ultimately we'd have been fine with just Shami.
Guess the second fast bowler is backup to the first in case of injury?
Should really find a fast bowling allrounder for that role then. Atleast they can add value with the bat.