Yep it's very depressing, the one guy who should be starting up front on performances is Rashford. Barely going to get any game time for Manure and not even in the squad for the main England side. People who go parrot the experience mantra should be shot on the spot. Does anyone seriously think Walcott is better than Rashford because of 'experience'?Rashford got an hat-trick for the u-21s, really deserved to be demoted I have to say....
No, but I don't recall anyone actually saying this, so this sounds like a straw man.Yep it's very depressing, the one guy who should be starting up front on performances is Rashford. Barely going to get any game time for Manure and not even in the squad for the main England side. People who go parrot the experience mantra should be shot on the spot. Does anyone seriously think Walcott is better than Rashford because of 'experience'?
Kane has looked like his shoes are wearing concrete overcoat for the past 4-5 months. Then you've got Sturridge who's constantly injured and Sterling who's extremely random.
substandard oppositionRashford got an hat-trick for the u-21s, really deserved to be demoted I have to say....
Says something about the Asian zone when the team topping its hardest group lost all its matches at the last World Cup.Our group is the hardest of the 2 in the Asian zone. The team Australia beat last night beat Japan away recently and you'd think the Japanese would be one of the top 2 teams in the group. Add the Saudis and you can see our road to qualifying is fairly tough.
Been there, done that and kicked their arseSays something about the Asian zone when the team topping its hardest group lost all its matches at the last World Cup.
Winner should have to be sent to be a play-off with a middling South American side.
Ah how can you not love it. It's great for the same reason it'd be great if every Olympic event contained one random person for scale.There's loads of **** teams who qualify from Africa and Asia because of Blatter pandering to them for votes, can't wait for the World Cup to go to 40 teams so more useless African sides make it.
I agree with the general sentiment, but I'm of the view that we see enough of this type of "festival" during the qualifying rounds.Ah how can you not love it. It's great for the same reason it'd be great if every Olympic event contained one random person for scale.
On a semi-serious note, if shite teams were excluded there wouldn't be a World Cup. They may as well accept that all international football will be extremely low-standard for the foreseeable future and turn it into a massive festival.
5 slots for a 54 nation Confederation is hardly pandering when UEFA's 46 members take damn near half of the qualification slots.There's loads of **** teams who qualify from Africa and Asia because of Blatter pandering to them for votes, can't wait for the World Cup to go to 40 teams so more useless African sides make it.
I think I might be missing your point. I can't think of anything less festival-esque than a World Cup qualifier. They're grim as **** and seriously need a rethink.I agree with the general sentiment, but I'm of the view that we see enough of this type of "festival" during the qualifying rounds.
Says nothing about the Asian confederation at all. SK and japan have done all right. Australia not bad either. You have to remember soccer was a minnow sport here until fairly recently and the Asian zone is still developing in relation to Europe and South America. Frankly I think Europe is over rated and should lose a few places they get simply bcos of the old boy network.Says something about the Asian zone when the team topping its hardest group lost all its matches at the last World Cup.
Winner should have to be sent to be a play-off with a middling South American side.
Says nothing about the Asian confederation at all. SK and japan have done all right. Australia not bad either. You have to remember soccer was a minnow sport here until fairly recently and the Asian zone is still developing in relation to Europe and South America. Frankly I think Europe is over rated and should lose a few places they get simply bcos of the old boy network.
I've always been an advocate of Oceania getting one automatic place at the World Cup, I'm just not a fan of the growing representation of Africa and Asia when they've done **** all to deserve it.Ah how can you not love it. It's great for the same reason it'd be great if every Olympic event contained one random person for scale.
On a semi-serious note, if shite teams were excluded there wouldn't be a World Cup. They may as well accept that all international football will be extremely low-standard for the foreseeable future and turn it into a massive festival.
Is it increasing that much? I thought if anything CONCACAF was the over-represented region.I've always been an advocate of Oceania getting one automatic place at the World Cup, I'm just not a fan of the growing representation of Africa and Asia when they've done **** all to deserve it.
Sorry, it was your more shite teams = festival point that I was musing over. Like you say, the World Cup qualifiers are terrible. My concerns are primarily that allowing more dross into the tournament itself would effectively render the early stages of the tournament proper an elongated version of the qualifiers. Accordingly, they'd be no more festive than the qualifying rounds themselves (i.e. they'd be pretty dire).I think I might be missing your point. I can't think of anything less festival-esque than a World Cup qualifier. They're grim as **** and seriously need a rethink.