No.'I knew Steve Smith would average 60 before he was born' - Furball
Figured he would be better. Figured he would be a solid low to mid 40s averaging batsman for New Zealand, and be part of a middle order triumvirate with Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson that would take New Zealand's test cricket to greater heightsYou thought Ryder would be better or worse than he turned out?
Tbf I thought Broad would average 22-25. I mean it's still theoretically possible...I thought Raina would be one of the best players of the decade. I thought Nathan Lyon would be a one off joke selection like Michael Beer or Xavier Doherty.
Stuart Broad sticks out as having proven A LOT of people wrong
Funny really, I think the guys proven me wrong by taking as many wickets as he has, never rated at all.Biggest disappointment for me is Morne Morkel.... thought he would be up there with the SA all time greats.
I have every now and then had a look at old threads because it's interesting to see this in full effect, and Anderson probably cops the worst of it, any thread from ~2008 really has it in for himJames Anderson. 20 matches into his test career he had 62 wickets at just under 40. Don't think anyone would have predicted he would get another 400 at that stage.
For those who don't know Goughy, he does know his fast bowling onions, so it's not just groupthink at playHe is being bashed because he inst very good. He isnt as good a bowler as he was 5 years ago and he will do nothing but struggle in the long term in Test cricket.
At the time he would bowl a 4 ball every over and only took wickets if it was swinging and was rubbish if it didn't. I can understand the criticism he got, the way he has answered it since has been brilliant.I have every now and then had a look at old threads because it's interesting to see this in full effect, and Anderson probably cops the worst of it, any thread from ~2008 really has it in for him
He had all the ability in the world, pace, bounce (from a good height) could even swing the ball.... but his length has let him down. And he never fixed it, he has always struggled to pitch the ball up and just bowled his 'natural' back of a length stuff.Funny really, I think the guys proven me wrong by taking as many wickets as he has, never rated at all.
This too. He is still good but nowhere near as great as I anticipatedI remember thinking Pujara would be the next Indian ATG bat. Obviously he still could be a very good player but won't scale those heights.
He didn't rate Broad either did he, summat about his action?I have every now and then had a look at old threads because it's interesting to see this in full effect, and Anderson probably cops the worst of it, any thread from ~2008 really has it in for him
For those who don't know Goughy, he does know his fast bowling onions, so it's not just groupthink at play
A lot of the time it's hard for him to pitch it up though because he'll be driven all day if he isn't getting any movement.He had all the ability in the world, pace, bounce (from a good height) could even swing the ball.... but his length has let him down. And he never fixed it, he has always struggled to pitch the ball up and just bowled his 'natural' back of a length stuff.
And thinking about it Duminy has also been a huge waste of talent. Could never quite make it into the great bracket, good but not great. And his bowling which showed so much promise has just totally devolved.
Happy to report that I never got on to the bandwagon praising ANY Indian fast bowler.It's so ****ing pathetic that our disappointments are the Ishants and Sreesanths while SA fans' disappointments are Morkels.