No real update other than it being diagnosed as bruising rather than a break etc.What's the latest on Cook?
He won't last long against Amir.Gets first test, can't see why they can offer him the series, looks very ordinary. He is lucky that they will be dropping Compton and may not want another change.
Borthwick and Robson may be better and they may not. After a promising start Robson got found out first time around as a test batsman. I've no idea if he went away and changed things like Bairstow or just trying to play the same way. His county form looks good, but playing at Lords you'd expect a decent average. Borthwick hasn't been tried as a batsman at test level so nobody.knows how he will cope under the microscope and opposition coaches and bowlers scrutinising his technique. I've seen more of Borthwick and he's gutsy and does the hard yards, but he isn't elegant or classically correct. More Collingwood than Vaughan.He is over Compton for certain, and I'm convinced he is over Vince, and Ballance needs runs in the championship before he gets a recoil, it's whether Moeen or Stokes is a better specialist bat over both Robson and Borthwick, which I don't think either is, which is why you judge between Moeen, Stokes and Woakes who is he better all rounder, which is why long term I'd go;
Cook
Hales
Robson
Roots
Borthwich
Stokes
Bairstow
Moeen
Broad
Finn
Anderson
Which is incredibly harsh on Woakes, but he's the first one in if any of Hales, Robson and Borthwick fail by the end of the India series, or any of the bowlers get injured (including Stokes)
For me he's out bowled Finn 3 innings on the bounce. At the moment he's proving a better option than Finn at 82 mph. Finn at 90 mph is the third best English steamer. If Finn finds his bowling mojo at Middlesex he plays, if he doesn't stick with Woakes. Pakistan will be a real contest and we will need 7 or 8 players playing well to win the series.All this angst about Woakes is pretty unnecessary I reckon, he's proved he's rightly part of the squad, he'll be in for any injuries from about 5 players,he'll play tests. He can't complain about English selectors because on his previous form he could have been ditched forever, yet he's clearly part of team England now.
Hmmm, not sure whta to think of Mahela..... I guess, in 5 years, if someone asks me about his commentary, I could honoustly say I don't recall him doing any commentary at all.Just watched the highlights. Not sure what was worse, Chandimal's keeping or Jayawardene's commentary. Ghastly stuff.
The usual idea is just to pick the guy with the lowest batting average, because they know that cricket is an RPG where you don't have enough stat points to put into both keeping and batting.And even if this not enough......, who is beter behind the stumps?
A line of thinking that has actually gained a lot ground with people whom you would suspect to have some common sense.The usual idea is just to pick the guy with the lowest batting average, because they know that cricket is an RPG where you don't have enough stat points to put into both keeping and batting.
At least in this situation he's sort of forced to talk about cricket.'You're in for a treat! We're going to pick the brain of Shane Warne!'
Total ****ing fawning over anything that comes out of these people's mouths. No wonder their comments turn to ****.