Starc's action is a thing beauty. Looks like he's bowling at half effortseriously if starc's action isn't biomechanically sound I don't know what is
yeah I'm just getting trolled aren't I
Aggressively mediocre. Pretty much the worst bowler to reach 400 wickets, so he at least has longevity going for him.Come on Jimmy is anything but mediocre.
This is called making stupid posts on cricket related forumsFirst Jimmy Anderson, then Micheal Starc. Some people just naturally gravitate towards mediocrity I guess.
Lol. Something, something black pots and kettles.This is called making stupid posts on cricket related forums
Don't bite Gob. You're better than this.Yes I'm the one who is making posts that suggest James Anderson is a mediocre bowler. Nah you are just making **** posts and I'm not
excuse me sir, I respectfully disagree with your opinionAggressively mediocre. Pretty much the worst bowler to reach 400 wickets, so he at least has longevity going for him.
Yeah, yeah it should have been "worst pace bowler to reach 400 wickets". I stand corrected.excuse me sir, I respectfully disagree with your opinion
Oh Great One, please forgive such mere mortals who dare think differently from you, if you don't forgive people they will forever be lost... :bizarre thread this one IMO
obviously Starc, though I could forgive people mistakenly thinking Amir
1) Do you actually watch any cricket outside of the November-January summer period on Channel 9?bizarre thread this one IMO
obviously Starc, though I could forgive people mistakenly thinking Amir
any other answer is trolling or very wishful thinking
tbf I hadn't even heard of "Chameera" or "Joseph", but upon researching seems like neither would even get a game in decent international sides so seems weird to list them