Bolded isn't true.Tons of experience, media savvy, good for sponsors, one of the best 6 bats in the country. Who would you replace him with?
He might be the best bat in the country but that's not the point. Making debut for one tourney only. Don't know if we are going to see Campbell after WC though. It looks like a short sighted move by HKCATons of experience, media savvy, good for sponsors, one of the best 6 bats in the country. Who would you replace him with?
That's how it was quoted by Charlie Burke in the media.Bolded isn't true.
I can see why they did it although not sure why he didn't play in the Asia Cup (other than he didn't come out of retirement in time to be put in the squad).He might be the best bat in the country but that's not the point. Making debut for one tourney only. Don't know if we are going to see Campbell after WC though. It looks like a short sighted move by HKCA
He actually was in the Asia Cup squad; he just wasn't selected in the eleven.I can see why they did it although not sure why he didn't play in the Asia Cup (other than he didn't come out of retirement in time to be put in the squad).
I can't really get behind this at all. I think people take the idea of being long-termists too far sometimes to a point where they're always just looking X years into future without ever reaching a point where they consider the now to be of critical importance. It doesn't get much more important than this tournament for a team like Hong Kong, particularly given the fact that the ICC seems very determined to make it hard for associates to qualify for the ODI World Cup.He might be the best bat in the country but that's not the point. Making debut for one tourney only. Don't know if we are going to see Campbell after WC though. It looks like a short sighted move by HKCA
Not as I recall it? He said he's one of the best batsmen in HK, which fair enough he is (averaging 40 odd in the domestic comp iirc), but I don't think he's even in the Top 10.That's how it was quoted by Charlie Burke in the media.
My post sounds over the top to me on second read but my position on this is that it's a short term solution. Guess HK's position from their pov is a difficult one; they would really want to send a message by performing well on world stageI can't really get behind this at all. I think people take the idea of being long-termists too far sometimes to a point where they're always just looking X years into future without ever reaching a point where they consider the now to be of critical importance. It doesn't get much more important than this tournament for a team like Hong Kong, particularly given the fact that the ICC seems very determined to make it hard for associates to qualify for the ODI World Cup.
It's fine to take a long-term view if you're building towards a set goal that actually gets closer by the day, whether that means a big limited overs tournament like this, or something like a three year plan put in place for a Test side. But I think you have to be working towards some sort of set point, else you get stuck in a perpetual cycle of constant rebuilding with the full strength team never ever on the field at any point.
Now, I actually question whether Campbell really is one of the best six batsmen available. He looked awful today and did very little in HK domestic cricket either other than take some jammy wickets and play some pretty slow knocks in the middle order for scores of 40-60. But whether he's good enough to make the side on merit should absolutely be the criteria he'd judged on at this point. This is the tournament HK have been building towards with their prior long-term planning.
So?Nick Knight just called a hip height full toss from the spinner outside the guideline "excellent bowling"