Yes... some of you only have such sarcastic statements to counter my claim. Another one like 'Sherif in disguise' etc etc.That makes me more to stick on to my stance on Imran.Like when compost gets broken down and maggots emerge.
Yes... some of you only have such sarcastic statements to counter my claim. Another one like 'Sherif in disguise' etc etc.That makes me more to stick on to my stance on Imran.Like when compost gets broken down and maggots emerge.
I like you.Yes... some of you only have such sarcastic statements to counter my claim. Another one like 'Sherif in disguise' etc etc.That makes me more to stick on to my stance on Imran.
Yes... some of you only have such sarcastic statements to counter my claim. Another one like 'Sherif in disguise' etc etc.That makes me more to stick on to my stance on Imran.
What are you saying ? Botham didn't include any others means he thought all others to be cheats? Yes my statement is off base & irrational...That is why Sarfaraz Nawaz,AamirSOHAIL,Shahbaz Sherif, Sandhu,Jhon Reid and a lot others accused Imran of tampering.Yes and Sir Ian Botham is a sole custodian for deciding who is a great cricketer and who is not. Since Botham only included Viv and Warne, I bet he thinks Tendulkar, Bradman, Lara, Marshall are cheats too.
Your arguments are so off base and irrational that it's difficult to even form an argument against it because I don't know which point I should dismantle first.
So the opposition accused Imran of cheating, so they must be right. Botham conveniently had no problems when Flintoff and Jones reversed the ball to win the Ashes 2005. That makes Botham a hypocrite with a national bias..kind of like a certain poster on this thread.
Aussies accused Steyn of cheating so by your argument, Steyn is a cheat too.
yeah..no matter of dislike with any others.after all it is only a matter of difference in opinion.isn't it?I like you.
it is clear from your avatar that you are a true lover of Imran.But then i too can have my opinions on him.isn't it?
man, rtramdas, you are awesome. Imran would have loved you as well.
What are you saying ? Botham didn't include any others means he thought all others to be cheats? Yes my statement is off base & irrational...That is why Sarfaraz Nawaz,AamirSOHAIL,Shahbaz Sherif, Sandhu,Jhon Reid and a lot others accused Imran of tampering.
You must not forget that Flintoff ,Jones etc came much later after Imran's days in cricket.I am not sure as to what was Botham's stance on them and the reasons for the same. But my main point is not that .Botham was one among several to accuse Imran. - that's the main point.
So when several players accuses one player that strengthens the belief. That is all
Only when he was able to manipulate the seam. Bloody cheat.Bowled great seam as well.
]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MGnf_xhXvw
Omg this is too funnyWhat are you saying ? Botham didn't include any others means he thought all others to be cheats? Yes my statement is off base & irrational...That is why Sarfaraz Nawaz,AamirSOHAIL,Shahbaz Sherif, Sandhu,Jhon Reid and a lot others accused Imran of tampering.
yes that is what happens when you view with your partial eyes. you saw only 'Shabaz' name. there are 4 more names.isn't it? but you missed them.Again ,i shall name a few more .... Maninder singh,Botham,Lamb,Robin Smith,Rameez RajaOmg this is too funny
Of course the only candidate more credible than the second best allrounder competing with him is his chief political rival
Ramiz Raja: Don't crucify Afridi | Cricket | ESPN CricinfoRameez Raja never called Imran a cheat.
Sarfraz Nawaz and Aamir Sohail are both part of two separate political parties in rival factions currently.
As for the others, that's fine. But then do you consider Steyn a cheat? because Clarke and Harris called him a cheat.
I vote this the stupidest thread of 2016.200 - Ishant Sharma
400 - Harbhajan Singh
800 - Muttiah Muralitharan