OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, Lyon will definitely be awesome the next time he visits India, especially if the pitches are as helpful to spin as they were in the SA series.
Scary thing is that after around 18 months/2 years of brilliance they all seem to have improved again this last 4/5 months.I live to see Smith scoring and Williamson failing but yeah both are quality and along with r00t its going to be a three horse race for years to come
He's certainly bowling—or has developed the capability to bowl—with much more sidespin than he used to this summer, which in theory should stand him in good stead.He was pants in India other than that spell, just like in the UAE.
He's too slow to be very effective on tracks with turn imo. He's best when batsmen feel a need to attack him and then deceive them in the air. Jord was sorta right in saying that, but I don't see why mode of dismissals should be considered when talking about the quality of a bowler. I've seen plenty of occassions where supposedly proper spinners have been attacked and have no answer. It's a different skill.
I imagine that would be the case.Just as unfulfillingly, no real progress seems to have been made on making helmet technology better. I realise there's those little blocks of plastic on the back now, but I've seen those detach pretty readily at the first sign of impact (perhaps that's the design though - dissipate energy by detaching?). I just don't think it's much progress really. It looks to me like a sop to make people feel a bit better about themselves; to allow a pat on the back and say 'job well done'.
Apologies if this has been covered off, which I presume it has. I can't believe I'm not reading more about it in the media.
Are we kidding ourselves about the whole helmet thing? We said a lesson had been learned on that awful day over a year ago, yet the Australian captain - a guy who was in Phil Hughes' side that day - isn't wearing any additional protection. If that ball from Wagner was 10cm lower, that's hitting him in exactly the same spot. I just don't get it. Do we need to learn again? Essentially, nothing has been learned at all. All we're doing a year on is expressing more sympathy to the batsman when they're hit - that's not a known antidote to a head injury, in any journals I've read. We aren't bowling less bouncers (I presume), most batsmen don't have the protection, presumably because it's uncomfortable (sigh).
We need to take the matter out of their hands and make them mandatory, do we not? I'm disappointed such an article wasn't written today.
it doesn't need to be particularly strong to divert the impact of the ball - and remember it's only designed to stop one impact.Just as unfulfillingly, no real progress seems to have been made on making helmet technology better. I realise there's those little blocks of plastic on the back now, but I've seen those detach pretty readily at the first sign of impact (perhaps that's the design though - dissipate energy by detaching?). I just don't think it's much progress really. It looks to me like a sop to make people feel a bit better about themselves; to allow a pat on the back and say 'job well done'.
You should have been here to read all the posts about Trent Boult before the summer started.I don't think I've ever seen a bowler so overrated in the last few pages.
I did see someone on Facebook post something stating that Boult was better than Hadlee once so I'm sure I can imagine what some overzealous kiwis would write about the guy here.You should have been here to read all the posts about Trent Boult before the summer started.
Anything to take a swing at Baz. It doesn't matter that the match situation was the end of the day, with Australia doing nothing but defending and no real harm likely to occur; let's put the boot in because now a kid might stand at silly mid off without a helmet.McCullum is frankly the worst. The captain of the national cricket team standing at silly mid off with zero protection. There are children watching. Disgraceful.
not really.Anything to take a swing at Baz.
There is a qualitative difference between helmets and arm guards/chest guards. The latter protects you from pain and injury, yes, but brain injuries can easily be permanent.Anything to take a swing at Baz. It doesn't matter that the match situation was the end of the day, with Australia doing nothing but defending and no real harm likely to occur; let's put the boot in because now a kid might stand at silly mid off without a helmet.
The Hughes incident was a massive tragedy and I think changed cricket and protection for the better but do keep in mind that it was an absolute freak accident. It's the same as people who bat without chest protectors or arm guards, broken arms and broken ribs happen but if you're not comfortable in the protection you're wearing then you won't wear it. Smith has probably worn that helmet type/shape his entire career.
Making it mandatory would be a good start; but do you then make arm guards and chest protectors mandatory too? And should a batsman be able to bat in a cap when spinners are on? Some of the worst injuries I've seen at club come from someone top edging a spinner into their own mug
Well I do.I don't really come down on a cricketer for doing what hes done pretty much his entire career
After yesterday I can't defend his captaincy but I don't really come down on a cricketer for doing what hes done pretty much his entire career, even when he was keeping up to the stumps I struggle to recall Baz in a helmet. It obscures vision and in my limited experience of fielding in a helmet I found it really made catching quite a bit more difficult.not really.
I've defended Baz' captaincy and batting throughout this series.
Whether you want to admit it or not, he's setting an example.
There are a couple of incidents where a batsman collapsed and died having been struck on the chest/heart by a delivery too though.There is a qualitative difference between helmets and arm guards/chest guards. The latter protects you from pain and injury, yes, but brain injuries can easily be permanent.