Oh of course, and I imagine he will. But calling him better than Clarke at this stage in his captaincy career is an utterly ridiculous assertion, if we're speaking tactically.He's been Test captain for how long? Give him some time to develop.
Especially when Guptill and Anderson play with such hard hands and in such predictable ways. The field placement and fielding has done nothing to stop KW from starting his innings off at a decent pace.Along with Smith's adept field placement couple with some outstanding fielding, it can feel impossible to score runs at times.
I hear for the next BBL the lucky KFC family of the day get to call no balls from the stands.Australia v New Zealand Test series: Darren Lehmann calls for square leg umpire to make no-ball calls
i sure hope lehmann has somehow been misquoted because this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard
I think you overrate Clarke as a captain. I always thought he was average tactically and highly poor in motivation and man management. The only series Clarke won that I recall came down to individual brilliance in the side rather than any shrewd tactics.Especially when Guptill and Anderson play with such hard hands and in such predictable ways. The field placement and fielding has done nothing to stop KW from starting his innings off at a decent pace.
Then either your memory is poor, or finally someone on this board knows less about cricket than I do.I think you overrate Clarke as a captain. I always thought he was average tactically and highly poor in motivation and man management. The only series Clarke won that I recall came down to individual brilliance in the side rather than any shrewd tactics.
Potentially so But I'd also point out that most Australian cricketers loathed Clarke as a captain and never felt he was a natural leader. I just don't remember anything he did that stood out to me in the same way that some of Jayawardene and his captaincy did, Jayawardene was a great tactician and came up with some great plays with an understrength team.Then either your memory is poor, or finally someone on this board knows less about cricket than I do.
Don't think Smith's attack is raw tbh. They may not have played as many games as Johnson but Hazlewood and Pattinson are quality while he has the experience of Siddle and Lyon not to mention a genuinely wicket taking 5th bowlerLet me add to that by saying with Mitchell Johnson and Ryan Harris in the side, backed up by guys like Siddle, Pattinson, Cummins and Lyon; you don't need to be a Michael Brearley level captain to get results. I think the same sort of stigma attached to Steve Waugh around him having the best side, rather than being the best captain could be levelled at Clarke. Clarke was highly dependent on Johnson being amazing during the bulk of his captaincy, I don't recall him marshalling a pretty raw bowling attack like the one Smith has at the moment.
Nah this is just plain wrong. He had to work with easily the weakest Australian side in the last 30 years, that it became good is testament to his skill at marshalling that attack.Guess I'm in the minority of people who think Clarke ultimately benefitted from the right team at the right time and even then witnessed a decline in the rankings for Australia. I think he was an amazing talent with the bat and possibly a little underrated at times, but I just don't recall him being an astute or tactically aware captain. I'll have to take your guys words for it but I still say he had a far better side to work with than most captains could dream of.
The 3 Tests to 2 thing, yeah that's not something any of us are fond of. Nor David White.David White is a lucking punt. By that he mean that it was a bit of a punt by NZ Cricket to instal him as CEO, but they were hoping for a bit of luck after the abject performance of Justin Vaughn in the role.
This lucking punt David White reduced a 3.test series against Australia to 2 tests, as he still has a hard-on for the Crapple Hadlee Cup, a failed concept that has been brought up from the crypt and placed on life support. He had all the NZ test players on a strict diet of ODI's leading up to the tests, and he ensured that the likes of Adam Voges and Nathan Lyon had a lovely first class game in NZ conditions prior to the first test. He obviously forgot which nations cricket board he is CEO of. What a lucking punt he is!
Well, he can. It was Clarke who decided to use him like the equivalent of a cannon in the first place, bowling him in four-over spells with targeted plans to each batsmen etc etc. Very different to how Ponting used him, for example.I really don't see how Ryan Harris, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle, Nathan Lyon can be considered weaker than say Peter Siddle, Josh Hazelwood, Jackson Bird and Nathan Lyon. Australia lived and died on Mitchell Johnson terrorising opponents. Clarke can't take credit tactically for the fact that Johnson was basically unplayable for two seasons, it really didn't matter where the fielders were in those spells.
But agree to disagree I guess; like I say I seem to be in the minority in my thoughts here so I'll stop defending them