and you definitely should not have said you were good to bowlShouldn't have batted for your ton Marsh. And then after getting your ton shouldn't have forgotten how to hit the ball.
That's what the JAMODI is now, because resting. Been that way for a few years I think.A series between two pretty terrible bowling line ups has made the batsmen look good.
Except for NZ for some reason, we play our test match bowlers and wonder why they get stress fractures or bruised bones.That's what the JAMODI is now, because resting. Been that way for a few years I think.
Me.Who was it that was saying India should have been celebrating those last couple of wickets because it may help win them the game? Reasonable call.
Pandey is definitely better than other 6th batting options we have. But playing Pandey will mean there won't be a decent 6th bowler. That's why probably Raina/Yuvraj/Gurkeerat should get the nod ahead of him for the time-being.Manish Pandey always looks good when he is batting.. But I am very very skeptical of his ability to perform consistently.
Decent game. Vindicates my stand that 330 is a decent score.
I don't think a dead rubber at the end of a random ODI series they already won can 'haunt' anyone.6) Mitchell Marsh shouldn't have bowled that last over. Hastings should have been held back. This loss will haunt M Marsh for some time.
Pandey is definitely better than other 6th batting options we have. /QUOTE]
Looby Loo will be proud of him
Will agree to disagree then.I don't think a dead rubber at the end of a random ODI series they already won can 'haunt' anyone.
I don't think he'll forget he lost the match he scored his maiden ton in by not bowling very well. Whether it'll 'haunt' him it's impossible to know though.I don't think a dead rubber at the end of a random ODI series they already won can 'haunt' anyone.