TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
ugh don't start again kidWell you wouldn't be, as you've aptly demonstrated in other threads you don't understand the basic economics of world cricket.
ugh don't start again kidWell you wouldn't be, as you've aptly demonstrated in other threads you don't understand the basic economics of world cricket.
I guess we will have Voges, Nevill, Hazlewood, Lyon and potentially both Marsh brothers playing in the Shield game. I would like to see Mitch play for WA, especially if we are going to persist with him at 6 in the Test team. It does make it difficult to work out who would replace him in the ODIs though, as we definitely need that extra bowling option in the top 6 with Maxwell so I kind of expect Shaun to play for WA while Mitch Marsh plays the ODIs.Not exactly going to be a great help for all the players who are in the ODI side...
Watto!!It does make it difficult to work out who would replace him in the ODIs though
Make that Boult and Southee firing as a unit, though wouldn't go as far as saying no chance.No chance for Kiwis to win unless Boult is back to his best. He didn't bowl that well against Sri Lanka also.
When Faulkner was at 6 and Wade at 7 the other day it just felt like our batting lineup was short to me. I agree that Watto is the logical choice.. a farewell tour of NZ is what we all want from young Shane.Watto!!
Or get Faulkner to play the Marsh role and Hastings to play the Faulkner role.
Well they need a seam bowling allrounder in the team unless they are playing in the SC so that automatically rules Maxwell out. Don't mind Forkers but I would probably stick with Marsh for a while cos I think he has a much higher ceiling than Forkers with the bat.I know he's got "potential" but I'm getting on board with the "drop M Marsh until he is genuinely good enough" boat
Faulkner or Maxwell would both be better at this stage in Tests for mine
Classic trolling from the Basin Reserve.It will absolutely be green and scare you all ****less but it won't seam and will be pancake flat after the first session.
He's an accurate medium-fast bowler, swings it both ways but doesn't hoop it, gets good movement off the seam when conditions suit too. Not that long ago he was absolutely cleaning up in Adelaide grade cricket and not getting a game for SA because they didn't think he could translate his skills to First Class cricket, so it's funny how things work out. I suspect he's been picked because the selectors have stereotyped NZ conditions instead of actually watching cricket there, but he's a probably the best available bowler anyway, after the other guys picked. Right selection for the wrong reason.Two questions:
1. Who is Chad Sayers
2. Gimme the fife
Hilfenhaus bowled outswingers from the hand. Sayers doesn't swing it as much, but swings it later and can bowl innies as well. Same sort of pace* and style other than that, though.Bit Ben Hilfenhaus?