• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Yasir Shah tests positive for banned substance

indiaholic

International Captain
Hmm.. Wonder what message that sends out.. Cheat so that your team wins and you get a lifetime ban. Accept money to lose games and you get welcomed back with open arms.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Hmm.. Wonder what message that sends out.. Cheat so that your team wins and you get a lifetime ban. Accept money to lose games and you get welcomed back with open arms.
except it's not just cheating so your team wins. It's cheating for personal gain just as much if not more than team gains. It's also preventing other non-cheaters from being selected, thus creating an atmosphere where you have to cheat in order to have a career in sport.
 

indiaholic

International Captain
Fair enough.. But Yasir's cheating doesn't have a negative impact on the paying public while a fixer basically puts the fundamental premise of all sports into question.
 

indiaholic

International Captain
That is without even mentioning the various criminal networks that players bring into the game when they decide to fix games..
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Fair enough.. But Yasir's cheating doesn't have a negative impact on the paying public while a fixer basically puts the fundamental premise of all sports into question.
that's true, but I would argue that the authenticity of a sport is also compromised by cultures of drug cheating. If the winner of a match is decided by whoever took the most drugs and compromises their health the most it also damages fundamental premises of sport.
 
Last edited:

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
and even aside from the deterrent part of it, if you've taken PEDs you've enabled yourself to train harder and longer than a clean athlete could; you've effectively bought yourself time that wouldn't be available in normal circumstances. So once you've drug cheated, you're always a drug cheat, whether you're still taking them or not. You're constantly cheating for the rest of your life.
 

indiaholic

International Captain
But all sportsmen compromise their health to some extent, no? Fast bowlers are prepared to suffer repeated back injuries, soccer, football and boxing almost ensures some level of brain damage.. Many of the fighting sports have severe weight cuts etc..

I am not disagreeing that doping is an offense and should be dealt with severely.. Just that in terms of overall damage to the sport, it ranks way behind match fixing. It changes the nature of the whole enterprise. It stops being a sport and devolves into mere entertainment.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
But all sportsmen compromise their health to some extent, no? Fast bowlers are prepared to suffer repeated back injuries, soccer, football and boxing almost ensures some level of brain damage.. Many of the fighting sports have severe weight cuts etc..

I am not disagreeing that doping is an offense and should be dealt with severely.. Just that in terms of overall damage to the sport, it ranks way behind match fixing. It changes the nature of the whole enterprise. It stops being a sport and devolves into mere entertainment.
It's not so much the compromise of health as the fact that it becomes a battle of chemicals rather than a human battle. And then the fact that that culture forces people who want to become career athletes to dope.
 

indiaholic

International Captain
In the case of leg spin bowlers, surely the greatest benefit has to be injury prevention? Wouldn't go so far as to say it completely devalues the human element.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
In the case of leg spin bowlers, surely the greatest benefit has to be injury prevention? Wouldn't go so far as to say it completely devalues the human element.
Well there are many different drugs that do many different things, and certainly a bit of extra strength and endurance helps if you're putting a lot of revs on the ball. But yeah, I generally think that injury prevention/recovery is probably the most widely applicable reason for using PEDs apart from the obvious ones in the obvious sports (blood doping in cycling, steroids in strength-critical sports).
 

cnerd123

likes this
FTR I don't believe in blanket, one-size-fits-all punishments for all offenders of a certain type. Be it doping or fixing. Every offence and every offender are different. I'd rather we respect the nuance involved and deal with each of them on a case-by-case basis.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sorry, my post was meant for the "Cheap online kitchens in Southampton" thread
 

Bahnz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Honestly think that PED's are every bit as bad as match fixing and should be treated just as harshly. You only have to look at what happened to Athletics in the 80's and cycling in the 00's to see the extent to which PEDs have the potential to undermine the integrity of a sport in the eyes of the public.
 

cnerd123

likes this
How much scope for nuance is there though? How do you separate out different 'levels' of doping?
Not an expert so I can't say anything for the actual doping part; but surely there is scope for nuance with regards to circumstances, motivations, etc.
 

Top