marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Thanks for extending Armstrong's loan.Three decent games against decent to good opposition and all we have to show for it is 0-1 0-1 0-1 **** me.
Thanks for extending Armstrong's loan.Three decent games against decent to good opposition and all we have to show for it is 0-1 0-1 0-1 **** me.
I'm sure that was called at the time by some of us and we were told we were wrong...True. Benteke was definitely a bad signing.
Yeah it was barely a touch but it doesn't really matter how big a touch it was as long as it's bigger than the area his hands are covering and he doesn't have time to react. Which realistically he didn't, IMO.Dandruff boy has got to do better with that surely, barely a touch from, Kolarov.
Well seeing as we're completely unable to defend crosses into the box, this should suit us fairly nicely on Friday.Them signing Benteke is the same as Chris Sutton going to Chelsea years ago. A good player totally unsuited to the style of play that the side you are joining will use. Both thrive on crosses into the box which neither side do.
Sorry, but this is just incorrect. Against West Ham, our entire game plan was feeding Benteke with the type of delivery he favours. He was just too poor to do anything with it. Barely attacked crosses, couldn't hold the ball up, etc.Them signing Benteke is the same as Chris Sutton going to Chelsea years ago. A good player totally unsuited to the style of play that the side you are joining will use. Both thrive on crosses into the box which neither side do.
Well signing a bloke like him and selling the only decent winger you have at the same time and not replacing him doesn't tell me that the club are building their play around him like Villa did. Not saying he is a brilliant striker you can do that with at a bigger club but his record at Villa was excellent and they played to his strengths week in week out and he got bundles of goals for them. Wouldn't be surprised if he banged goals in somewhere else if was to leave in the summer.Sorry, but this is just incorrect. Against West Ham, our entire game plan was feeding Benteke with the type of delivery he favours. He was just too poor to do anything with it. Barely attacked crosses, couldn't hold the ball up, etc.
EDIT: We attempted 32 crosses. West Ham attempted 12. West Brom 21. Stoke 20.
Sorry, but this is just incorrect. Against West Ham, our entire game plan was feeding Benteke with the type of delivery he favours. He was just too poor to do anything with it. Barely attacked crosses, couldn't hold the ball up, etc.
EDIT: We attempted 32 crosses. West Ham attempted 12. West Brom 21. Stoke 20.
He doesn't even need a tonne of crosses, just good ones. Villa in the preceding seasons with Benteke only made about 1.5 more crosses per game than Liverpool in the same time.Well signing a bloke like him and selling the only decent winger you have at the same time and not replacing him doesn't tell me that the club are building their play around him like Villa did. Not saying he is a brilliant striker you can do that with at a bigger club but his record at Villa was excellent and they played to his strengths week in week out and he got bundles of goals for them. Wouldn't be surprised if he banged goals in somewhere else if was to leave in the summer.
Point I was making he was the one quality wide player who could perhaps have put a decent ball in. Villa set up to provide, didn't see the game yesterday so can't comment on the quality of service but it looked a strange fit when you signed him and still does.He doesn't even need a tonne of crosses, just good ones. Villa in the preceding seasons with Benteke only made about 1.5 more crosses per game than Liverpool in the same time.
I think in this day and age, if the likes of Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Ibe, Moreno et al can't cross the ball - especially for their prices - then it's not about an individual player.Point I was making he was the one quality wide player who could perhaps have put a decent ball in. Villa set up to provide, didn't see the game yesterday so can't comment on the quality of service but it looked a strange fit when you signed him and still does.
Id rather talk about how well Martial played tbh.Great goal by Rooney, which doesn't seem to have been mentioned so far.
Eh?Great goal by Rooney, which doesn't seem to have been mentioned so far.
I'd never really given this sort of thing a lot of thought, but now it's been brought to my attention, it has really made me wonder. Could provide some explanation for his...less than electric displays that have been the norm for a while now.'I just think he's been playing so long now that maybe it's 30 on his birth certificate but in terms of games played he's a 35-year-old player.'