Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
You're quite right about Lord's. Adelaide is a bit more of a nuanced case - Craig didn't play particularly well, but it wasn't his decision to have him bowling against a one-legged biffer without a deep midwicket, and he did make the very real contribution of removing a set Smith with the old ball. Without that we could've been easily facing a big first innings deficit given how well Nev played after tea.Would we have lost at Lords and Adelaide without him?
Some Mark Craig stats:
In wins (6 tests) - he averages 120 with the bat and has taken 33 wickets at 26.7
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
In draws (2 tests) - he averages 30.66 with the bat and has taken 6 wickets at 64.5
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
In losses (5 tests) - he averages 20 with the bat and has taken 7 wickets at 109
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
NZ just have to win more often and he's gonna be better than Sobers.
Anyway, ftr I think Craig's a spud, and I'm perfectly down with him being binned. My point was more in regards to the value in having the balance that a genuine spinner provides. I tend to think that Saunter really isn't good enough to play that role, but I'm OK with giving him a shot. Tend to doubt Astle will do much better. Too slow, doesn't do much with the ball, not much bounce, not even very accurate.
Last edited: