Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
From a quality of cricket point of view that's true, but it misses most of the point of the plot. Botham was having a hard time as captain. How a good a captain he might have been we'll never know as he was thrown in against the West Indies home and away and lost both series, as any captain would have. It also seemed to affect his performances. The First Test was lost in 81 and the second drawn after which he resigned about 10 seconds before he was due to be sacked. There's the famous (almost infamous) moment at Lords where he got a pair and as he walked off the members ignored him completely. Botham himself tells of how they were reading papers and doing up their shoe laces and just generally deliberately not acknowledging him. He says he never raised his bat to them again in the future, but I'm not convinced about that. The cricket in the next three Tests was completely freakish. Certainly not high quality, in fact much of it pretty poor. Much of the story is behind the scenes stuff with the Botham turmoil, the checking out of the hotel, the Marsh and Lillee 500-1 bets against their own team. If you reduce the 81 series to a Botham slog and Willis spell at Headingley, a Botham spell at Edgbaston and innings at Old Trafford I guess it wasn't that great.At the time, I managed to miss all the best bits of 1981 as my travels around Europe started on the rest day of the Leeds test and ended after the Manchester one. The only English paper I could find in Zurich was the Financial Times, whose coverage of the 4th day at Leeds was rather brief.
Playing devil's advocate, I have previously argued that although the best bits of that series were extraordinary, they only amounted to about three days in total. The last two and a bit sessions at Leeds, the last couple of sessions at Edgbaston and Botham's innings at Old Trafford. The rest of 1981 wasn't great, whereas nearly all of 2005 was unmissable.