Especially against Jadeja.. There were quite a few near half volleys that could have been scored off.So, Amla falls, after playing 167 balls.
I'm not sure what to think of this innings. I'm very much impressed by his wicket occupation. It's what test cricket is all about! Wait for the odd poor ball and hit it. But Amla just got 2 boundaries of 167 balls. I find it hard to believe he was served just the 2 poor balls. In that sense, he missed a trick, I guess.
Lol if the rest of your top order had batted like Amla in the first innings, you could have won this.If only Amla showed more application, better footwork, technique etc. Nothing to do with the pitch at all.
Yeah he was battling it out..I just wonder if he would have been better served by going after at least one of the bowlers a little..because just blocking it out wasn't going to get you anywhere. 2.5 days to go, you are not drawing this. You might as well try to get the runs.So, Amla falls, after playing 167 balls.
I'm not sure what to think of this innings. I'm very much impressed by his wicket occupation. It's what test cricket is all about! Wait for the odd poor ball and hit it. But Amla just got 2 boundaries of 167 balls. I find it hard to believe he was served just the 2 poor balls. In that sense, he missed a trick, I guess.
It's a difficult pitch is what everyone has conceded. You need to up your game. Like Amla did.If only Amla showed more application, better footwork, technique etc. Nothing to do with the pitch at all.
Vijay has had the best approach in this and the earlier game. Play with soft hands when defending and push hard when attacking.Yeah he was battling it out..I just wonder if he would have been better served by going after at least one of the bowlers a little..because just blocking it out wasn't going to get you anywhere. 2.5 days to go, you are not drawing this. You might as well try to get the runs.
The curator of course. He did the job asked of him.Who should be Man of the Match? Murali Vijay for his 40 or Shikhar Dhawan for his 39?
Yeah that looked bad.Woo, ball keeps low again. But don't worry they should have batted better can't blame the pitch.
This but unironically.Woo, ball keeps low again. But don't worry they should have batted better can't blame the pitch.
Yea exactly. You need to be looking to score runs in order to make mistakes to lose your wicket. If you instead look to occupy the crease and just put the bad balls away, batting looks easy.The reason the pitch looked different for a little bit when Amla and Du Plessis were batting was very simple, they had managed to occupy the crease and adapt. I am not expert on cricket or batting but the only thing I picked up/learned from Inzy and YK was that everytime they got a hundred and were asked how they went about it, they always had the same answer "I just tried to stay at the wicket". And when you do that, suddenly it looks like the pitch flattened out. Then a wicket falls, a new guy comes in and the pitch is the same again.
He played a poor shot. If you can't see that, then might as well go home and simmer in your bitterness.Woo, ball keeps low again. But don't worry they should have batted better can't blame the pitch.