• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in Australia 2015

kiwiviktor81

International Debutant
You'll end up with a Shane Watson if anyone goes ahead with this mentality tbh.
Nah, Aussie had better players than Watson, you just didn't pick them for some reason.

The BCs have no-one better than Guptill. No-one is even close at the moment imo.
 

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
I would be a no nonsense coach the following is what caught my eye as being unacceptable by my standards from both teams.

New Zealand

Guptill fending one off his chest to Joe Burns. Just duck next time. Or wear it. But man up and deal with that short stuff.
Baz being bowled off a nothing delivery by Marsh - learn to defend. You said you had recently learned the shot now show it. Also get a lighter bat, your bat speed was too slow and you failed to catch up with some deliveries.
Tom Latham getting out playing an attacking shot in the final inning. Either open the batting with Baz or instruct your openers to stone wall. Don't tell your openers mixed messages like - don't give your wicket away but take what is on offer and we will reassess at tea. That is just a recipe for wickets and it led to Kane and Ross yet again having to do a cameo. Get better tactics.
Mark Craig - you are a spinner. How hard is it to be accurate. Extremely hard based on watching you. Not acceptable bowling. And unacceptable batting with Ross. You may have cost him a triple century. Our entire tail seems to have been given the message "express yourself with the bat". Why. Why have they been given this message. Let them play supporting knocks when required. That test match in England where we threw away a draw boggles the mind and there should have been accountability afterwards.
Henry - you are out of your depth.

Australia

Mitchell Marsh - Learn how a test cricketer constructs an innings. You seem to have very few gears to your batting at the moment.
Nathan Lyon. The spin bowler must be the smartest bowler in the team and you put little effort in on that front.
Joe Burns - no comment. He did his best. I would not be on his case. But would be giving him remedial batting lessons.
Hazelwood - Work harder. Earn wickets. Pull finger.
Neville - stop being a ****. Not every time, but on several occassions when Joe Burns did some screw up at short leg, Neville gave it the old raised eyebrows and get a load of this guy to the captain at second slip. Be loyal. No room for people like that in my team.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nah, Aussie had better players than Watson, you just didn't pick them for some reason.

The BCs have no-one better than Guptill. No-one is even close at the moment imo.
Wasn't so much that problem with Watson I was referring to, its more the problem where Watson would contribute just enough at the least critical point of a series or do just enough in dreadful series to keep himself secure.

If the genuine consensus is that there's no one better than Gotpills?/Suckstill then fair enough but Brownlie/Raval are at least worth having a look at during a home series rather than giving a known quantity a chance to pad his stats.

Although I suspect albeit in a bit of ignorance that something must be terribly wrong with Raval's game to warrant scant mentions anywhere for selection.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
The BCs have no-one better than Guptill. No-one is even close at the moment imo.
I think this is a bit much. It's fair enough to say he deserves a longer run given he hasn't be horrible and the lack of particularly exciting alternatives, but Brownlie at the very least qualifies as "close" even if you think Guptill is better.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Neville - stop being a ****. Not every time, but on several occassions when Joe Burns did some screw up at short leg, Neville gave it the old raised eyebrows and get a load of this guy to the captain at second slip. Be loyal. No room for people like that in my team.
I reckon Nevill was suggesting someone else should be fielding there rather than being a **** to Burns.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nah, need a true Queenslander with testes of titanium in at short-leg, since we're short of Tasmanians.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Australia's policy of just blindly putting the noob at short leg is idiotic. I know it's a radical idea but how about putting your best short leg fielder in that position? Sure, it's a crap place to field, but if you're not prepared to do whatever it takes for your team to succeed then you shouldn't be playing for your country.
 

Gob

International Coach
Australia's policy of just blindly putting the noob at short leg is idiotic. I know it's a radical idea but how about putting your best short leg fielder in that position? Sure, it's a crap place to field, but if you're not prepared to do whatever it takes for your team to succeed then you shouldn't be playing for your country.
There are better short legs (ie Smith) but if they put them there then they'll lose a valuable slipper and they are already running out of good slippers
 

BeeGee

International Captain
There are better short legs (ie Smith) but if they put them there then they'll lose a valuable slipper and they are already running out of good slippers
The captain can't field there, it's a terrible position to captain from. IMO, short leg is a more important fielding position than slip. Warner would be my choice, but just choose the best.
 
Last edited:

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
I remember when Alistair Cook had to field at short leg. Complete mismatch for the position. Some 6 foot 2 bloke who had a tough time bending down - told to go in there because he was the N00b. Good times.

Based on the amount of balls smashed into him at short leg during the game I am of the opinion that the only person suited to the position is some N00b. Burns could have been injured on a number of occassions and you don't want that happening to Warner.
 

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
Now that I think about it, Smith needs to accept some criticism. Taylor and Williamson weren't going to pop one up to short leg once they were set. Yet he persisted in having one in there, and at one point Taylor smashed a pull shot into his chest. On another day that could have been a serious accident or even fatal. You wouldn't see me agree to field short leg against a Ross Taylor with his eye in nor would I endanger any of my team mates by putting anyone in there against him. When we do use the position in club cricket it is against players who are afraid of the ball and less competent off the back foot. Once a guy is on 40 we tend to spread the field. A short leg against our openers is a good idea, not so much against our two good batsman.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Worst example of the short leg convention is Ian Bell. Outstanding short leg but fields in the slips because he's a senior player and has cost us test matches with drops while we have some n00b at short leg.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
I remember when Alistair Cook had to field at short leg. Complete mismatch for the position. Some 6 foot 2 bloke who had a tough time bending down - told to go in there because he was the N00b. Good times.

Based on the amount of balls smashed into him at short leg during the game I am of the opinion that the only person suited to the position is some N00b. Burns could have been injured on a number of occassions and you don't want that happening to Warner.
If you're worried about a player getting injured then don't field anyone there. But if you are going to play a short leg, which is purely a wicket taking fielding position, there's no point putting someone there who's crap at it.

This is another one of those things (like night watchmen) that teams do without any kind of in depth risk/reward analysis.
 

Top