Flem274*
123/5
well then i'd be stuck with eyeliner and no one else so no thanks. luckily that's not how i use the ignore feature.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Official** New Zealand in Australia 2015
- Thread starter Hurricane
- Start date
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
how long till Black Warrior comes and makes a #BadForTestCricket comment?
adub
International Captain
There's not a long wrong with a guy who cashes in when he gets a bit of luck.
Spark
Global Moderator
Not at all.
Skyliner
State Captain
Mian Hamza: "283-1, Is it WACA or wankhede??"
Jarrod: "These flat Australain tracks make for a bit of snoozefest. Wasn't there complaint's last year about the pitches being only suited to flat track bullies?"
Great comments on Cricinfo. Meanwhile the spineless NZ posters on here assume the position and roll out the effete "we're worse than the Windies" gibber.
Jarrod: "These flat Australain tracks make for a bit of snoozefest. Wasn't there complaint's last year about the pitches being only suited to flat track bullies?"
Great comments on Cricinfo. Meanwhile the spineless NZ posters on here assume the position and roll out the effete "we're worse than the Windies" gibber.
The kind of thing you'd expect from Neil Harvey Rants on Twitter #bloodyhopeless
Gob
International Coach
Skyliner
State Captain
I'm challenging you to a duel. Swords or pistols?
I don't want to let anyone down by pointing out that is ****ing ridiculous that we lost a review for a decision that was the direct carbon copy of a dismissal upheld in the first Test. And Nigel Llong gets to hide behind the fact that we used one poor review.
Good thing we're getting flogged anyway and it doesn't really matter. Still maintain the rule needs to change.
Good thing we're getting flogged anyway and it doesn't really matter. Still maintain the rule needs to change.
Man, this is an ass pummeling of epic proportions! We are 100% impotent and the Australian juggernaut is unstoppable.
Now that I've got that off my chest, some analysis.
1) NZ bowlers are suited to swinging conditions. If the ball doesn't swing, we're screwed
2) McCullum's "gambling" only pays off if we've got form favouring us. As it stands our bowlers are bowling poorly and Australia are rampant
3) Speaking of form, we are definitely underdone preparation wise
4) Australian bowlers are "in to the deck" bowlers and will do better than NZ bowlers
5) Just in case you didn't get what I was saying, WE'RE SCREWED! :-(
Now that I've got that off my chest, some analysis.
1) NZ bowlers are suited to swinging conditions. If the ball doesn't swing, we're screwed
2) McCullum's "gambling" only pays off if we've got form favouring us. As it stands our bowlers are bowling poorly and Australia are rampant
3) Speaking of form, we are definitely underdone preparation wise
4) Australian bowlers are "in to the deck" bowlers and will do better than NZ bowlers
5) Just in case you didn't get what I was saying, WE'RE SCREWED! :-(
Bahnz
Hall of Fame Member
Jesus Christ, quit being such a a whining sook. Just ****ing dire posting.
The review is meant to prevent howlers, not for 50/50 decisions. Given so much is going against us it would have been nice if we've had gotten one of these 50/50 calls but it's all going Australia's way. Having said that it would not have made much difference in the context of the game me thinks.
You take the sword. I'll take the pistol. Savvy?
