Hunter in the Otago squad.
There was a bit of love on this forum for Jamieson, but of those two giant blonde clones in the U19s -I actually preferred Hunter (although selectors didn't agree when Randall came into team the next year and he and Jamieson were the 2 seamers in the spinners-fest UAE World Cup).
But anyway, Hunter got more side on and got outswing. Action reminded me of a 6 foot 8 Kyle Mills.
Read the article.
My opinion that Young looks good v spin based on such thorough analysis as seeing him use his feet v spinners on the video scorecard boundaries. (admittedly, I see him do this regularly)
E.g. Opinion NOT based on viewing his defensive technique, use of crease, sweep, or even ability to tuck them off his pads for a single.
Therefore was interested in this bit of the article:
I am fine with you having that view. I have a different view. And I don't think its important that we agree but do you use your feet against spinners?Use of the feet to hit over the top never over-excites me tbh; it's when you see a batsman confidently use his feet to spin to defend or push singles that you know it's a properly developed skill.
Slightly odd how Young wasn't required to put a touch player in that top 5. I quite like Nicholls as a hustling LO player, but he's done very little in red ball cricket.JA Raval, DG Brownlie, MG Bracewell (c), HM Nicholls, C Munro, DC de Boorder (wk), AF Milne, TD Astle, IS Sodhi, N Wagner, JA Duffy, KA Jamieson (12th)
I looked at that lineup and thought it was Munro who is the only I see not potentially paying test cricket for NZ in coming years, and therefore don't see rationale for him being in this series and Young not.Slightly odd how Young wasn't required to put a touch player in that top 5. I quite like Nicholls as a hustling LO player, but he's done very little in red ball cricket.
Well we know Hesson still sees something there. Admittedly it's probably "00011000111100011" in nature, and a non-abacus wouldn't understand. I enjoy the fact that they them keep hitting him with Asian spinners rather than Shield attacks though, I suppose.I looked at that lineup and thought it was Munro who is the only I see not potentially paying test cricket for NZ in coming years, and therefore don't see rationale for him being in this series and Young not.
Other than that, a good selection. Much better than that Littlejohn/Buchanan series v India A about 3 seasons ago. Although this may just reflect the bulge of talent and more than usual death that's working its way through the system.
People expect me to laud a new player who brings a certain aesthetic to the game, more so than even-tempered precision. You're the Roger Federer of the forum though; your seal of approval is supposed to mean that player is both stylish and substantive.Haha yeah I did like those posts but surely the people who made them are more attached to them than I am..
I'm pretty sure when Woodcock debuted as an opener for Wellington there was a comparison to Edgar. It's fitting that he has been restored to the top under Edgar's guidance.Haha Woodock doing well again. Not so well that he puts my TAB money in jeopardy I hope.
“They turn up here in the stadium, they wander in there and go ‘oh, I must just have a few hits’. What’s the point in having a few hits when there’s no purpose about it? So it’s to encourage the guys to be more self-sufficient about how they go about their training, what they’re working on, create scenarios, raise the bar in terms of intensity, so there’s always a purpose do what they’re doing. Then, culturally, working on that. Developing character, leadership and development, just helping them with that. And as they get better as players, and as individuals, hopefully success pops out the top.”
the **** takes his shoes off in the library thoughWho brings it up more than you? Almost everyone likes him