LegionOfBrad
International Debutant
Harder to critisise today as he got some runs but sometimes his shot selection leaves a lot to be desired.
Look, I understand you say this isn't the thread for it. That is okay. But this is where I think you miss the modern evolution of ODI thinking with regard middle order and engine room. Give the higher SR players more balls. If they fail, you have the safer options to follow with lower SR.Seriously, Stoinis and Wade are both cake-y batsmen. Maxwell and Marsh are not. I can accept batting Maxwell ahead of 'em because you rate him a better bat, but ffs, this isn't time to make an upside-down cake.
Haha upside-down cake! I like it.Seriously, Stoinis and Wade are both cake-y batsmen. Maxwell and Marsh are not. I can accept batting Maxwell ahead of 'em because you rate him a better bat, but ffs, this isn't time to make an upside-down cake.
You can't really always "pick the right ball" to reverse sweep. You almost have to start doing it before the bowlers even let go of the ball. What he should have done is adjusted when the ball was obviously not there to be hit.Poor shot selection there.
I'm not going to decry people getting out reverse sweeping simply because its a reverse sweep (for Maxwell it definitely is a 'normal' shot), but that wasn't the ball for it.
This is why I don't want to see Maxwell bat any lower than 5. It will win you more games than lose.Look, I understand you say this isn't the thread for it. That is okay. But this is where I think you miss the modern evolution of ODI thinking with regard middle order and engine room. Give the higher SR players more balls. If they fail, you have the safer options to follow with lower SR.
Its about efficiency in achieving the highest possible total most often. Its like having Duminy bat after Miller and Roussow - despite averaging more than them and being far more cakey.
I have said my piece now.
By doing it you are putting pressure on the cakes if higher SR players fail. The cakes can't fail in this situation whereas they can build an innings coming earlier and they know that strikers are sitting in the dug out. SR is high for a reason. These guys play high risk shots and cricket. By stacking them high in the order, you are preparing for a fail safe situation.Look, I understand you say this isn't the thread for it. That is okay. But this is where I think you miss the modern evolution of ODI thinking with regard middle order and engine room. Give the higher SR players more balls. If they fail, you have the safer options to follow with lower SR.
Its about efficiency in achieving the highest possible total most often. Its like having Duminy bat after Miller and Roussow - despite averaging more than them and being far more cakey.
I have said my piece now.
Lyon (ACT)
Yep. It is annoying though as I genuinely think he can eventually be a useful red-ball cricketer. A few quiet ODI games can put him even further down the pecking order and/or lose confidence.I'm honestly not sure how Stoinis has ended up on a tour let alone in the Australian Cricket Team
One of life's mysteries
Yeah I wasn't sure about that one lol
Not as good as the figures suggest, but still pretty impressive. The benificiary of some variable swing and poor batting.They could still end up close to 300 at this rate.
Not that I've seen any of it. How did Willey bowl? His figures at the start of the innings are terrific.