...against England?They have no one else. Excited by his talent so I hope he can kick on without being dragged down by the team/politics. The ton he scored vs Aus was a top knock.
Yeah. My bad. Relied on my faulty memory and should have checked....against England?
Yeah, definitely not. Just in the WI team that role creates a balance concern, considering Ramdin isn't really a Test #6 and the tail is pretty weak.Being a slight better version of Sammy isn't an insult. Sammy was a pretty decent cricketer and deserved to be there more often than not, a **** side made him look worse than he was. He was a competent lower all rounder.
Being a passable 7 and a good 8 has no bearing on if he is a good cricketer or not, it isn't Sammys problem that he didn't help team balance. No one did. The only thing that would have bettered WI and helped people play in positions that suited them would have been Dwayne Bravo and that was apparently not on the table.Yeah, definitely not. Just in the WI team that role creates a balance concern, considering Ramdin isn't really a Test #6 and the tail is pretty weak.
A few more big individual performances from him will silence those voices.I'm more worried about him being looked upon by others as the "board's man", and undermining his ability to get the players to follow him. That's a tough thing to sort out as a 23 year old amongst older players.
He's a better bowler than he's a batsman; but WI needs his batting more ATM than his bowling imo.Also, didn't really watch a huge amount of their series' vs Eng & Aus, but his bowling is a few levels above Sammy isn't it? I mean, I still think he's one of their four best bowlers when you look at some of the quicks they've selected in recent times.
Maybe he stops you from playing two spinners in the Windies, I guess. Certainly OK to play the role as third quick isn't he?