Good, Burgess had to be in. Disappointed about Cipriani, but understand why he wasn't selected.Burgess is in. Twelvetrees is out.
I'd have taken Cipriani over Goode; for all the latter's distribution skills his lack of gas means I can't see him ever being a genuine threat to the best defences in tests.England could win this cup just quietly they have selected their best squad possible. No screw ups by the selectors despite some claims to the contrary.
All going swimmingly Goode won't play. He is a depth player. By making sensible selections at the centres the odds on England have shortened with this news,I'd have taken Cipriani over Goode; for all the latter's distribution skills his lack of gas means I can't see him ever being a genuine threat to the best defences in tests.
Our back row looks strong on grunt and short on guile too, but the Kvesic ship had sailed as soon as we named Robshaw captain. Huge work rate and all that, but not a proper ball scaving 7.
Minor gripes though. Injuries (Corbs & Croft), dickheads (Hartley & Manu) & playing in France (Armitage, S) aside, we've probably done as well as we could've.
Of course you could go out at any stage but so could SA and so could the All Blacks. We have lost in the quarterfinals by not taking them seriously before. Every team needs to be at its best.I seriously doubt England's ability to win this competition. On a one-off occasion, we can pull together and beat South Africa/New Zealand (Australia is a different matter), but having to play Wales, then Australia, then Scotland in the quarters (which won't be easy), then SA in the semis and NZ in the final in order to win in the space of a month will put serious strain on this relatively inexperienced side. We just won't come up trumps every time. In order to win we'd have to be playing our best rugby every minute of every game, and even 10 poor minutes against a top side will cost us a game (as shown against France), and we can't afford that. Also, I don't think we have the quality in the pack to match up to SA, amongst others, so it's a semi-final exit for England at the hands of SA for me. That's if we get out of the group, which remains to be seen.
But SA and particularly NZ win games even when they don't play their best - my mind goes back to New Zealand vs Wales last year, when Wales were leading for most of the game, and NZ were perhaps the poorer side, but they pushed through owing to superior ball players (Barrett scored a cracking try) and mental strength and that certain Kiwi belief that you can't lose, and so won. SAs immense physical power and fitness mean they are always in games. England don't have the quality of player, nor the mentality to take them to victories when they're down. SA won't face a tough game until the quarters, when they'll play Aussie or Wales (hopefully), whereas England will have had to put in two big shifts already to overturn Wales and Australia in the group. I'm probably rambling now, but these are my thoughts on why England won't win. Note that I'm a typical pessimistic British ***.Of course you could go out at any stage but so could SA and so could the All Blacks. We have lost in the quarterfinals by not taking them seriously before. Every team needs to be at its best.
England are in this like dirty shirts.
I like Naholo too but you can't pick a guy who broke his leg 6 weeks ago. That's one hell of a gamble on both him and his career. Of course he's going to jump at the opportunity but when is he getting game time to test it properly?Bar one or two debatable positions, it's fairly predictable. Wearing my Highlanders hat, I like the Naholo selection. He can play both wings (scored 9 tries on the left wing for the 'Naki) last year, and he fits into the mould of being a player our opposition at the RWC won't know too much about - ala Mehrtens, Lomu, Kronfeld at the 1995 RWC.