• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Choose a first name and a last name and then make a team out of it. A very fast draft

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
01. Jack Hobbs
02. John Edrich
03. Graeme Pollock
04. Jacques Kallis
05. John Reid
06. John Waite+
07. Shaun Pollock
08. Jack Gregory
09. Jack Cowie
10. John Snow
11. Peter Pollock
John Edrich played plenty of matches @ number 3 if you wanted to include Jack Fingleton up top. I say this because Reid's average was pretty meh
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
i guess the theory is there's fleetwood in there


I had that rule mainly because Clarke and Clark def shouldnt be allowed, i dunno how to approach this. lets put it to public opinion
 

kingkallis

International Coach
If I cant have it then I will go for another name since I wont be able to pick a spinner with that name.

Smith is there so I dont see any issue in that name. I will let the fellow drafters decide though.
 

AldoRaine18

State Vice-Captain
John Edrich played plenty of matches @ number 3 if you wanted to include Jack Fingleton up top. I say this because Reid's average was pretty meh
Seems like a decent swap to be honest. Had Reid earlier for his bowling option but clearly no need for that now.

01. Jack Hobbs
02. Jack Fingleton
03. John Edrich
04. Graeme Pollock
05. Jacques Kallis
06. John Waite+
07. Shaun Pollock
08. Jack Gregory
09. Jack Cowie
10. John Snow
11. Peter Pollock
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
I don't care if you have Fleetwood-Smith in your team, but on principle if two names pronounced the same such as Clark and Clarke aren't allowed, surely you can't consider Smith and Fleetwood-Smith the same.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
oh **** it you can have fleetwood-smith ha. and i'll allow clarke and clark. hope this doesnt ruin peoples plans
 

kingkallis

International Coach
Warne and Warner are different names.

Stewart and Stuart are same. Brian and Bryan are same. Mohammad, Mohammed, Muhammad are same. Smith and Smit are same. Its all about how 'they' pronounced back then.
 
Last edited:

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
^excactly the reason why I decided to just ok you kallis. Kallis is done, Fleetwood-Smith is allowed and I'm gonna allow Clarke/Clark

your move Vic
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
I'm, taking a chance because I'm not sure If I will be around for the next 12 hours.

It's not like I can win so I say Clarke and Clark are the same to shove it up the Michael's, Mo's and Ian's. As it is, I'm going for Barnes. I'm sure there are plenty better to balance my side, bu I guess I have to choose first for you all to rub my face in it. Nevertheless, I'm confident that my GOAT bowler will destroy all your teams.

Graeme Gooch
Graeme Smith
Graeme Pollock
Graeme Thorpe
Sid Barnes
Graeme Hick
Graeme Fowler
Billy Barnes
Graeme Dilly
Sydeny Barnes
Graeme Swann
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
It appears MisterMr didn't specify the track and cricketweb rules means that defaults to matting in South Africa yeah?
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
If that '?' refers to my last comment, I am just trying to big up the advantage of having Sydney Barnes, trough a ruse of bull and bluff.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
it is but I literally don't understand the sentence, not necessarily the point you were trying to make
 

Top