• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Tennis Thread

Furball

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Question for those who follow tennis more closely than I do:

Which of Federer, Nadal or Djokovic at their absolute peak do you think was better?
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Furball said:
Question for those who follow tennis more closely than I do:

Which of Federer, Nadal or Djokovic at their absolute peak do you think was better?
Click to expand...
in my opinion:

1. Novak 2011
2. Federer 2006
3. Nadal 2010


But overall Federer is probably the most amazing sportsmen I've ever had the privilege of seeing.
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Anil said:
for me it was federer...

also novak to finally win cincy tomorrow...
Click to expand...
Not sure if Novak is 100% fit, but you'd think its going to be damn hard for Fed to beat Novak on hard. Then again Gulbis, Goffin and Dolgopolov have come damn close last 2 weeks and Fed ****s on them.
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Yeah its close. Not wanting to turn this into a Warne vs. Murali debate, but you gotta look at who Novak was beating the **** out of in 2011. He was blitzing peak Rafa, Fed and Muzz.

He needed to win the French that year, and it would have definitely been him.
 
A

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
to elaborate on my point...

grass - federer, djokovic, nadal
fast hard courts - federer, djokovic, nadal
slower hard courts - djokovic, federer, nadal
indoor courts - federer, djokovic, nadal
clay - nadal, djokovic, federer

overall federer...
 
Lillian Thomson

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
This means Federer overtakes Murray in the rankings and will be Number 2 seed at Flushing Meadow. It means that depending on the draw Murray might have to play Novak in the semi's.
 
A

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
well federer will lose early one of these years and that's all he will need to ensure a win...he was far from his best this week and still managed to reach the final...i am sure it will happen for novak...
 
A

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
picks to win the u.s.o? my picks are novak or andy for the men's title, you-know-who will win the ladies' final...
 
Last edited:
Spikey

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Jono said:
Yeah its close. Not wanting to turn this into a Warne vs. Murali debate, but you gotta look at who Novak was beating the **** out of in 2011. He was blitzing peak Rafa, Fed and Muzz.

He needed to win the French that year, and it would have definitely been him.
Click to expand...
you just said Fed's peak was in 2006 though


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top