Only because of a very generous declaration. Was it not for rain the first two Tests would've been comfortable enough wins for Australia I feel.Yeah and NZ got robbed in the days before DRS in the deciding test in 2001/2 at Perth
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6UlqoVovU9M
If that had been given we would've won and could've easily won the 1st test too
Thorpe was unlucky, as his back was no longer fit for purpose by then so he missed out. I suppose there's a bit of a 'what if' there, because if he had been fit, and given Bell averaging over 200 against Bangladesh immediately before the 2005 ashes, would Pietesen have even been picked? Gough was gone by then. Ramps would almost certainly have scored more runs than Bell had he been brought in to replace the youngster mid-series, but I don't recall any sort of clamour for that. Perhaps it's a shame that Stewart had retired a couple of years earlier. He probably wouldn't have missed as many chances as Geraint Jones, and he'd been in seven unsuccessful ashes campaigns going all the way back to 1990/91.^I really wish at least one veteran of the 90s team (Gough, Ramprakash and Thorpe were realistically the only players still a chance of selection right) had been part of the 05 team, they really deserved to taste ashes success after literally losing how many series in a row? At least 6 or something. Imagine if Stewart or Athers had lasted til 05. Would have made a great moment even greater IMO
Yeh, Stewart and Thorpe would've been the two guys who I'd have liked to have seen get that success. The last selection in the English team was a choice between Thorpe and Pietersen and I think KP gave England a bit of spark and self belief that'd been missing from their team. Perhaps Thorpe could've played in place of Bell.Thorpe was unlucky, as his back was no longer fit for purpose by then so he missed out. I suppose there's a bit of a 'what if' there, because if he had been fit, and given Bell averaging over 200 against Bangladesh immediately before the 2005 ashes, would Pietesen have even been picked? Gough was gone by then. Ramps would almost certainly have scored more runs than Bell had he been brought in to replace the youngster mid-series, but I don't recall any sort of clamour for that. Perhaps it's a shame that Stewart had retired a couple of years earlier. He probably wouldn't have missed as many chances as Geraint Jones, and he'd been in seven unsuccessful ashes campaigns going all the way back to 1990/91.
Being pedantic a bit here, but you guys didn't win 03/04.Yeh, look, fair enough, but...
2/1 India's way is hardly "destroyed" especially in Indian conditions, although India's wins in the first two tests were fairly comprehensive.
Once again, 2/1 in India. But yeh, fair point.
Yeh, we won those.
I think of the Australian period of dominance beginning in 95 in the Windies series and going through til around the end of Ponting's captaincy. I get that we lost a few series in that time, but what I meant was we were the clear #1 side in the world for a long time. I might've been clearer in what I meant I guess.
Both Pakistan and India had very good teams in the 80s.When I was a kid I remember NZ's 1-1 draw with the Windies - 1986/7
Gordon Greenidge got a double in one test and they had Haynes, Richie Richardson, Viv, Marshall and the other quicks
against Hadlee, Martin Crowe, John Wright, Coney, Ian Smith & co.
Perhaps the two greatest bowlers of all time along the master blaster, NZ's best ever bat and a few other top players.
The 2 best teams of the 1980s (although Pakistan were close to NZ for 2nd)
By memory their bowling was a bit average. Kapil Dev was very very good. I have no idea who else they had - Cheetan Sharma perhaps.Both Pakistan and India had very good teams in the 80s.
That is true, but NZ were unbeaten in series at home for the entire decade, won series away in Australia, England and Sri Lanka and were the only team to beat the Windies in the 1980s (1-0 in 1980) and in 10 tests against the Windies in the 80s won 2, lost 3, drew 5. (1 series win each plus a drawn series)Both Pakistan and India had very good teams in the 80s.
Might not be among the best series ever but still was a great one. Malik vs Warne in that series is some of the best quality of cricket you will ever see.The last test was very memorable. Not sure about the rest of the series
We all know what happened but relive it for us anyway. Want to hear someone tell it who watched it,The 1981 Ashes. The quality of cricket didn't match the 2005 series, but the way it unfolded like a comic strip or far fetched movie plot made it unique.
Pakistan was generally regarded the best team after the Windies in the 80's though yeah its splitting hairs between Pak and NZ.When I was a kid I remember NZ's 1-1 draw with the Windies - 1986/7
Gordon Greenidge got a double in one test and they had Haynes, Richie Richardson, Viv, Marshall and the other quicks
against Hadlee, Martin Crowe, John Wright, Coney, Ian Smith & co.
Perhaps the two greatest bowlers of all time along the master blaster, NZ's best ever bat and a few other top players.
The 2 best teams of the 1980s (although Pakistan were close to NZ for 2nd)
At the time, I managed to miss all the best bits of 1981 as my travels around Europe started on the rest day of the Leeds test and ended after the Manchester one. The only English paper I could find in Zurich was the Financial Times, whose coverage of the 4th day at Leeds was rather brief.I never thought I'd see a better series than the 1981 Ashes - I was wrong then, but I really do doubt whether I'll ever need to change my mind again - 2005, and by a fair distance if I'm being totally honest